[Spoilers] What the heck is this Kerrigan video all about????

[dustinbrowder]

I'm saying that in order to learn about spoilers, you must first actively search them out. So, when you do find out what they are and thus 'ruining' your own experience, you only have yourself to blame. It's not as though the leaker e-mailed it to you with a fake title, or anything like that.

Who is actively seeking? I saw blizzard expansion ending revealed all over the internet, its not like I'm searching.
And I still hate the leaker for ruining people experiences.

[Pandonetho]

And I still hate the leaker for ruining people experiences.

You ruined it yourself by watching it. It's a video, are you honestly saying that some other force besides your own weak will was at work in forcing you to watch something you didn't want to watch?

[mr. peasant]

blizzcon sc2 panel

Really? Which part? I do vaguely remember something along the lines there but I recall thinking at the time for some reason that it was more the missions themselves and the minor details, and not the overall story/plot (which was supposedly so big they needed to split into three games).

[Xarthat]

If you think Blizzard will change anything big from that cinematic because of the leak, you're wrong. Leaks never changed anything bigger than developers' mood. As I said, they're very stubborn with their stories. They won't change it due to some laughable "feedback".

[Spartan13]

Why does everyone think that this finale is actually their final decicion?

[DemolitionSquid]

Why does everyone think that this finale is actually their final decicion?

Because its terrible. Which is how Blizzard roles.

[Jabber Wookie]

I actually wouldn't mind this resolution as an ending if they edited the cheesy dialogue. I can't stand SC2's dumbed-down script and child-like characters.

In addition to more complex, character driven dialogue than WoL, all I want is more overall plot-based missions and cutscenes than WoL. I was mostly disappointed with the WoL story because so much of it was irrelevant, pointless side stories. Not to mention, many of the meaningful plot points were full of holes and contradictions.

[Spartan13]

Really? Which part? I do vaguely remember something along the lines there but I recall thinking at the time for some reason that it was more the missions themselves and the minor details, and not the overall story/plot (which was supposedly so big they needed to split into three games).

Can't remember which part it was and currently am too lazy to look for it

[Louis]

I actually wouldn't mind this resolution as an ending if they edited the cheesy dialogue. I can't stand SC2's dumbed-down script and child-like characters.

In addition to more complex, character driven dialogue than WoL, all I want is more overall plot-based missions and cutscenes than WoL. I was mostly disappointed with the WoL story because so much of it was irrelevant, pointless side stories. Not to mention, many of the meaningful plot points were full of holes and contradictions.

Why do people have this double standard? It's very much expected for RPGS to have all this stuff on the side, but if it's done in an RTS it sucks?

[TheEconomist]

You ruined it yourself by watching it. It's a video, are you honestly saying that some other force besides your own weak will was at work in forcing you to watch something you didn't want to watch?

I didn't watch the video yet I've been spoiled. So, yeah, I'm a bit bitter at whoever leaked this.

Why do people have this double standard? It's very much expected for RPGS to have all this stuff on the side, but if it's done in an RTS it sucks?

Too different to compare. Especially when the prequel had such a good linear story.