Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread: Why are DT's more expensive than Stalkers?

  1. #1

    Default Why are DT's more expensive than Stalkers?

    Forgetting balance right now. Why, lore-wise, would a DT cost more than a Stalker? If we assume that the price for warping-in is teleportation cost and not production cost, and if Stalkers are DTs fused with armor (without Warp Blades), Stalkers should cost more. What are your theories? (Other Gateway units can be discussed too)
    http://i.imgur.com/8oAhR.gif

  2. #2
    Lopan91's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    127

    Default Re: Why are DT's more expensive than Stalkers?

    you have to feed dts

  3. #3

    Default Re: Why are DT's more expensive than Stalkers?

    last i checked protoss dont have mouths. lmao
    http://i.imgur.com/8oAhR.gif

  4. #4
    ooZer0's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    94

    Default Re: Why are DT's more expensive than Stalkers?

    I have no idea how that has anything to do with this topic sylvstelon. Nor did it really make sense...

    Perhaps the constant psi drain that maintaining the invisibility overloads the circuits in a DT's armor quickly, thus causing their equipment to break down more often and require constant repair.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Why are DT's more expensive than Stalkers?

    Perhaps the in-game 'Dark Templar' units represent elite fighters/assassins where as Stalkers can be made from any member of the Nerazim (the culture the Protoss from Shakuras identify themselves as)? That would make the former rarer to come by, and thus more 'valuable'.

  6. #6
    spychi's Avatar SC:L Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,224

    Default Re: Why are DT's more expensive than Stalkers?

    Quote Originally Posted by sylvstelon View Post
    Scout the spire, build phoenix. Stalkers are generally too slow to catch up with mutas.Manually detonating banelings around DTs could work.If your opponent has enough gas to sustain such a force, though, you might just be getting outplayed.Also, put down a couple spore crawlers since they're a bit sturdier than overseers.If they fly and attack a different base, Stalkers will have a hard time catching up, even with blink.
    dude did you just read the thread topic and not read the op?

    well lore wise it doesn't make sense, balance wise cheaper DTs would be OP
    however less gas for a DT would be nice to see, let's say 125min/75gas

    Mass Effect Universe Fan, I support Mass Effect 2 and Battlefield: Bad Company 2 for Game of the year award! ME2 still is being the best rated game this year! Keep it up

  7. #7

    Default Re: Why are DT's more expensive than Stalkers?

    Quote Originally Posted by mr. peasant View Post
    Perhaps the in-game 'Dark Templar' units represent elite fighters/assassins where as Stalkers can be made from any member of the Nerazim (the culture the Protoss from Shakuras identify themselves as)? That would make the former rarer to come by, and thus more 'valuable'.
    That makes sense, although I like to think the whole 'the commander/Executor/queen pays a lump sum of minerals and gas and a unit appears' thing is just a gameplay mechanic, and the lore is somewhat more complex. Command and Conquer economies make no sense to me.

    In reality, they'd have to deal with wages (assuming the protoss have currency), arming and feeding the troops, as someone else said, treating them if they become ill or wounded, et cetera.

    In terms of lore, that would probably make the stalker more expensive, actually. A cybernetic mech, capable of teleportation no less, probably costs a lot more to maintain than the ceremonial armour of the dark templar assassins.

    However, if we go back to the wages idea, it could be that the dark templar make much more money than the stalkers, given they are basically going on a suicide mission every time they leave the base. They are invisible, but if they get caught, they're screwed. Stalkers on the other hand can teleport out of the action. Less danger.

    While we're on the topic, since every mission is a suicide mission for the dark templar assassins, and the protoss are a very religious or ceremonial (in my eye) society, it stands to reason that before each mission, there would be some sort of 'good luck' ritual to send them off, which could be costly in itself.
    Last edited by Sheliek; 11-17-2010 at 07:24 AM.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Why are DT's more expensive than Stalkers?

    I think the cost aspect of the game is less that than a representation of the value and scarcity of a unit (i.e. the more expensive a unit, the less readily available they are for deployment), and not a reflection of the cost of producing and/or maintaining said unit.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Why are DT's more expensive than Stalkers?

    Quote Originally Posted by sylvstelon View Post
    Scout the spire, build phoenix. Stalkers are generally too slow to catch up with mutas.Manually detonating banelings around DTs could work.If your opponent has enough gas to sustain such a force, though, you might just be getting outplayed.Also, put down a couple spore crawlers since they're a bit sturdier than overseers.If they fly and attack a different base, Stalkers will have a hard time catching up, even with blink.
    WHAT? You are all wrong, you must scout armory and then build zerglings to kill thor because thor is so slow. But if you get banelings hope he get marines.
    /lolwhut off

    Maybe they got more "dead" dark templar then actaully alive, they are more important to the race as a whole then stalkers are seeing they are like almost dead anyway they are more robots then actual protoss only infused with the essence of a "dead" dark templar. Immortals maybe cost more because they are still alive just got severe body damage so they need the exoskeleton to move around and use their experience as soldiers soldiers.
    /non-researched based thoughts.
    Last edited by Twilice; 11-17-2010 at 09:27 AM.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Why are DT's more expensive than Stalkers?

    Maybe minerals and gas are like payment. A stalker asks for less money because he just wants to get some action before he dies while a DT charges more because he is more "valuable" and takes much bigger risks than a stalker (sometimes).

    Yours Truly,
    SonOfChaos

Similar Threads

  1. Is Nydus Worm a bit too expensive?
    By Nottoway in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 08-17-2010, 03:55 PM
  2. ZvP mass stalkers and colossi
    By Rezildur in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-19-2010, 11:18 AM
  3. creating dt's without power to dark shrine...bug or intentional?
    By silencbank in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 05-10-2010, 11:07 AM
  4. Protoss Stalkers, Organic or Machine?
    By screw_ball69 in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 128
    Last Post: 10-26-2009, 03:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •