Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Anti-UI Mechanics

  1. #1

    Default Anti-UI Mechanics

    To begin with I have no delusions that the following ideas have any chance to be implemented so please don’t comment on their feasibility in this game.
    I had an idea one day when I was playing Zerg. I was just picturing some green goo streaming down the screen while I was playing. And I thought, “Hey why not have certain abilities effect the user interface?” So here are my ideas, trying to fit them to each race, making them completely different, yet all affecting the UI and all being higher tier.

    ZERG

    ABILITY: The anti-UI-mechanic would spray green group all over the enemies’ screens. It would last a certain amount of time as the visibility starts out horrible, then as the green goop slides down the screen the vision would get better.

    CASTING: The Greater Spire would have the ability. It would not be energy based; it would simply be cool-downed based (like blink and charge). It would last a specific amount of time and the cool-down would be longer than the length the ability lasts. The animation for the casting of it would be green spores and stuff spraying out of the top of the Greater Spire.

    LORE: It fits with the Zerg using biological things such as ensnare, plague, spore’s, and fungal growth. It’s very Zergish to use physical things such as goop to affect their enemies, instead of technological things or mental things like the other two mechanics.

    BALANCE: The Greater Spire is difficult to get so it is very high up the tech-tree and is also expensive. The Greater Spire is also VERY specific in the purpose of getting it, this would give the player another reason to get it.


    TERRAN

    ABILITY: The anti-UI-mechanic would cause static in its field of effect on the minimap for all enemies. This would not only stop enemies from seeing anything in the field of effect, but would stop all messages in those locations (“our hive is under attack” and such warnings from the race’s respective advisors).

    CASTING: The Sensor-Tower would upgrade into another building (much as a Command Center would upgrade into a Planetary Fortress). It would be a passive ability (like Mothership cloak), affecting the same radius as the Sensor-Tower’s ability. It would require the Fusion Core, and would be expensive to upgrade the Sensor-Tower.

    LORE: It fits with the Terrans being very technology based. They have been using things like scanners since SC1 and they’ve only done that more in the sequel.

    BALANCE: It is very high up the tech-tree but can be rushed to, so it’s not as useful as the other two abilities, yet useful enough to want to get to. It’s also expensive.


    PROTOSS

    ABILITY: The anti-UI-mechanic would cause all enemies’ hot-keys to no longer work. This means they would have to use the mouse for all their commands including assigning and using control groups, and telling units to move and attack.

    CASTING: The Mothership would have the ability. It would be energy based and it would be a high energy cost. It would be a channeled ability and would last a specific amount of time. There would be some visual cue to let a player know the ability is being casted on him.

    LORE: It fits with the Protoss being very pisonic. It’s as if the Protoss are using pisonics to mess with the commander’s minds of their Terran enemies, the overlord’s ability to govern their Zerg, and the Protoss’ connections to the Khala.

    BALANCE: It gives the Mothership another reason to come into play; it gives the Mothership more use in the game. The Mothership is already high in the tech tree, and expensive. The ability would contend with the other abilities and since it’s channeled it would defiantly be a good choice for the player to make

  2. #2

    Default Re: Anti-UI Mechanics

    No. Just no. Absolutely horrible idea.

    Then this game would be more about luck, less about micro.


    Stand and deliver, that my hamster might have a better look at you.

  3. #3
    WhoamI's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    59

    Default Re: Anti-UI Mechanics

    for custom game it would be cool.

  4. #4
    MajinX's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    140

    Default Re: Anti-UI Mechanics

    Quote Originally Posted by Dropsonic View Post
    No. Just no. Absolutely horrible idea.

    Then this game would be more about luck, less about micro.
    it isnt a horrible idea, better than alot of the ones ive heard on these boards, all of these moves are like super hard to get to and cannot be spammed so are very situational end gamers. Although it should be optional and def placed in some custom games.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Anti-UI Mechanics

    Terrible. Random spores shooting out of the spire? That is just stupid.

  6. #6
    MajinX's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    140

    Default Re: Anti-UI Mechanics

    Quote Originally Posted by Hav0x View Post
    Terrible. Random spores shooting out of the spire? That is just stupid.
    hmm i think some ppl are having different visual images than wat i do... try picturing this. A larger (greenish) dark swarm over and around the greater spire, making it very hard for the opponent to see under it and also disallowing targeting units/buildings under it besides the greater spire. Altho things like scan or detectors will allow you to see through it.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Anti-UI Mechanics

    Quote Originally Posted by MajinX View Post
    hmm i think some ppl are having different visual images than wat i do... try picturing this. A larger (greenish) dark swarm over and around the greater spire, making it very hard for the opponent to see under it and also disallowing targeting units/buildings under it besides the greater spire. Altho things like scan or detectors will allow you to see through it.
    That's not what the OP described at all.

    And both are stupid ideas.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Anti-UI Mechanics

    Quote Originally Posted by MajinX View Post
    hmm i think some ppl are having different visual images than wat i do... try picturing this. A larger (greenish) dark swarm over and around the greater spire, making it very hard for the opponent to see under it and also disallowing targeting units/buildings under it besides the greater spire. Altho things like scan or detectors will allow you to see through it.
    That is different than what I envisioned. I envisioned the Greater Spire shooting out the spores and goo much as the Queen does here Spawn Larva ability. Just a breif momment of spewing as the effects las a while (think of sneezing in ur motorcicle helmet, all over the visor).

    But your idea is actually pretty interesting I think.

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    131

    Default Re: Anti-UI Mechanics

    At least this is better than blizzard's idea of balance.
    ~KyranX

  10. #10

    Default Re: Anti-UI Mechanics

    Nobody's made the analogy with RA2 superweapons yet?

    Preventing your opponent, or getting prevented from playing the game doesn't enhance gameplay at all.

    for custom game it would be cool.
    The protoss one already exists in a challenge; there might be a way to fiddle with the editor to get it to work. There must be diverted ways of reaching the same result as all three of these though.

    At least this is better than blizzard's idea of balance.
    Really? Care to elaborate?

Similar Threads

  1. Macro Mechanics Discussion Thread
    By ArcherofAiur in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 3274
    Last Post: 07-20-2010, 07:37 PM
  2. Favorite Macro Mechanics
    By pure.Wasted in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-31-2010, 04:32 PM
  3. Examining the Macro Mechanics
    By Gradius in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 11-29-2009, 05:18 PM
  4. New Article for the Macro Mechanics
    By RODTHEGOD in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-29-2009, 10:43 PM
  5. Making the Macro Mechanics Permanent?
    By ArcherofAiur in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 05-23-2009, 09:10 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •