After watching the cinematic in which Gen. Warfield is forced to fight zerg in CQB after running out of ammo, I got to thinking about all the discussions on various forums a couple of years back complaining about the marine's bayonets and shields being out of place.
This cinematic alone is probably the ultimate vindication of the counter argument. The fact that Warfield's rifle WAS equiped with a bayonet is arguably what allowed him to survive long enough to be saved. Had he and his remaining soldiers been equipped with shields, they would've stood a better chance of surviving, and he would've likely been able to keep his right arm.
![]()



. The fact that Warfield's rifle WAS equiped with a bayonet is arguably what allowed him to survive long enough to be saved. Had he and his remaining soldiers been equipped with shields, they would've stood a better chance of surviving, and he would've likely been able to keep his right arm.

Reply With Quote


