Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: General Warfield Is Taking Terrible, Terrible Damage!

  1. #1

    Default General Warfield Is Taking Terrible, Terrible Damage!

    Last thread I'm gonna post since I feel like I'm spamming. For those who haven't made it that far in the game -



    Who here just burst out laughing at that? Be honest.
    SC2 handle - "DrakeyC, code 929"

    I ARE A PROPHET! I've predicted three major aspects of SC2 correct, more or less.

    June 2007 - I predicted the Protoss campaign would give you new tech as you conducted diplomacy among tribes.

    Hidden Content:
    July 18th 2010 - I predicted Raynor would broadcast information of Mengsk's actions on Tarsonis to discredit him and incite rebellion.


    Hidden Content:
    June 16th 2010 I predicted the Voice in the Darkness was the commanding force behind the Hybrids. I'm calling it half-right.

  2. #2

    Default Re: General Warfield Is Taking Terrible, Terrible Damage!

    I kinda just put my face into my hands and went "oh my god. Those guys. This is so not the time for that joke."


    The Mother of all Queens!

    Thanks to Dynamik- for the signature!

  3. #3

    Default Re: General Warfield Is Taking Terrible, Terrible Damage!

    Quote Originally Posted by Aldrius View Post
    I kinda just put my face into my hands and went "oh my god. Those guys. This is so not the time for that joke."
    I disagree - its ALWAYS the time for that joke!
    SC2 handle - "DrakeyC, code 929"

    I ARE A PROPHET! I've predicted three major aspects of SC2 correct, more or less.

    June 2007 - I predicted the Protoss campaign would give you new tech as you conducted diplomacy among tribes.

    Hidden Content:
    July 18th 2010 - I predicted Raynor would broadcast information of Mengsk's actions on Tarsonis to discredit him and incite rebellion.


    Hidden Content:
    June 16th 2010 I predicted the Voice in the Darkness was the commanding force behind the Hybrids. I'm calling it half-right.

  4. #4

    Default Re: General Warfield Is Taking Terrible, Terrible Damage!

    lol I was like really pun as u are crashing ? xD

  5. #5

    Default Re: General Warfield Is Taking Terrible, Terrible Damage!

    Well, it's only a joke because of the devs, in-context it makes perfect sense.
    SC2 handle - "DrakeyC, code 929"

    I ARE A PROPHET! I've predicted three major aspects of SC2 correct, more or less.

    June 2007 - I predicted the Protoss campaign would give you new tech as you conducted diplomacy among tribes.

    Hidden Content:
    July 18th 2010 - I predicted Raynor would broadcast information of Mengsk's actions on Tarsonis to discredit him and incite rebellion.


    Hidden Content:
    June 16th 2010 I predicted the Voice in the Darkness was the commanding force behind the Hybrids. I'm calling it half-right.

  6. #6

    Default Re: General Warfield Is Taking Terrible, Terrible Damage!

    Quote Originally Posted by Drake Clawfang View Post
    Well, it's only a joke because of the devs, in-context it makes perfect sense.
    hahaha Warfield is a great character xD I was actually wondering where that line will come out

  7. #7
    Progenitor's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    27

    Default Re: General Warfield Is Taking Terrible, Terrible Damage!

    When I saw that I did start laughing. Gotta love blizzards jokes.
    BANELINGS!

  8. #8

    Default Re: General Warfield Is Taking Terrible, Terrible Damage!

    I like how he went "my ship has taken terrible TERRIBLE damage"
    great exaggeration on the second terrible

  9. #9
    Maul's Avatar Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,218

    Default Re: General Warfield Is Taking Terrible, Terrible Damage!

    I really liked it. Great little easter egg (kinda) for those who follow SC2 closely like us, and still is in-context for anyone else who doesn't.
    I really need to change this...
    Check out my maps: Maul's Spirial Turret Defense and Maul's Risk: Bel'shir

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    103

    Default Re: General Warfield Is Taking Terrible, Terrible Damage!

    I thought it worked very well, and I had a really good laugh seeing it

    Think the general did a good job keeping it serious as well, I just wish he spoke with a little more emotion, he always seem monotone

Similar Threads

  1. Zeratul side missions are terrible
    By Wankey in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: 08-03-2010, 10:19 PM
  2. Terrible campaign
    By deadlock in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 07-30-2010, 07:35 AM
  3. Starcraft 2 Beta is taking way too much space!
    By Cheesenium in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 06-05-2010, 04:11 PM
  4. What do you think about C++ in the editor and general thoughts?
    By SlickR in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-05-2010, 08:40 AM
  5. Damage system and bonus damage
    By Perfecttear in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 01-19-2010, 07:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •