Page 6 of 12 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 112

Thread: All Starcraft 2 Cinematics

  1. #51

    Default Re: All Starcraft 2 Cinematics

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Blade View Post
    Now to voiceacting this is my list from best to worst (this is just related to the cinematics):

    Mengsk
    Horner
    Ariel
    Zeratul
    Tychus
    Tosh
    Nova
    Raynor
    Horace
    Swann
    Valerian
    Queen of Blades
    Sarah Kerrigan
    Here's mine =D:

    Horner (I personally find he's the only actor that's shown good acting. he's also got a pretty good character)
    Tychus (His voice is like honey, hardened, then grated.)
    Mengsk (Not as good as in the first game (loved the News Flash bit), but he still has that powerful, awesome voice.)
    Swann (When I heard his voice in 07, I was going to really like him, then I was disappointed when they changed it to Fred's cartoony take in 09. Now he ain't so bad, must've realised how cheesy it was.)
    Horace (I think it's actually his character's facial expression that has pulled this guy down)
    Ariel (Not much on her side, but she did prove to be better than many others)
    Zeratul (Jack Ritschel, may he rest in peace.)
    Nova (didn't hear much of her so we can't really judge)
    Kachinsky (I liked his VA in the BlizzCon 07 vid where they introduced the story mode space, I can tell there's a difference, but he's still better than the below)
    Sarah Kerrigan (would've preferred Talken, but Helfer pulled it off well enough, I'm more concerned for the way she actually looks aesthetically)
    Raynor (*sigh*, Clotworthy's really lost it. I wouldn't blame the dialogue.)
    Queen of Blades (not a prejudice against the VA, she really doesn't sound great, 'cept for the part after she regrows her blades)
    Valerian (I was hoping to like this character.. oh well)
    Tosh (I dunno, when I first heard him at BlizzCon 09, the film clip that was shown had a lot more gravity to it. Now hearing more of Tosh, his VA sounds like he's trying a bit too hard.)

  2. #52
    spychi's Avatar SC:L Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,224

    Default Re: All Starcraft 2 Cinematics

    I am bit dissapointed with the plot, we all predicted de-infestation of Kerrigan and at this point I can assume that BLizzard's games are cliche and much repetitive
    we didn't see how it come to that

    Mass Effect Universe Fan, I support Mass Effect 2 and Battlefield: Bad Company 2 for Game of the year award! ME2 still is being the best rated game this year! Keep it up

  3. #53

    Default Re: All Starcraft 2 Cinematics

    The point is that people are jumping to conclusions from bits and pieces. And I liked Valerian's voice. Also the bulk of th dialouge is probably in game. You can get the general idea of the plot from the cinematic, but not the details...
    Last edited by flabortast; 07-25-2010 at 02:57 AM.
    Decepticons, transform and rise up!

  4. #54
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    69

    Default Re: All Starcraft 2 Cinematics

    There are a few things I feel a bit confused after watching all the cinematics... No biggie but I am just curious...

    Q1. As we know, the Protoss successfully de-infested and cured Stukov with their serum in SC1, so why Kerrigan can't be de-infested in this way too but done by Xel'Naga Artefacts instead?

    Q2. Char is a volcanic planet with very high temperature but why is there still rain on this planet?

  5. #55
    Pandonetho's Avatar SC:L Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,214

    Default Re: All Starcraft 2 Cinematics

    Q1. As we know, the Protoss successfully de-infested and cured Stukov with their serum in SC1, so why Kerrigan can't be de-infested in this way too but done by Xel'Naga Artefacts instead?
    My theory. Actual reason: Collecting artifacts gives the player more missions to do things instead of just having Raynor up and grab a serum from the Protoss.
    My lore reason: Some of the Protoss may be chummy and friendly with Raynor but I highly doubt that they'd up and help him grab Kerrigan to inject her with a serum. Most Protoss would want to kill her. Even Zeratul wants to kill her. Secondly, is the difficulty of getting to her. I highly doubt it's a trivial matter trying to inject Kerrigan with a nanite serum, considering she's surrounded by billions of Zerg.
    Lastly, the artifact probably provides an easier alternative TO the aforementioned problem. Not only that, it's possible for Blizzard just to throw out some made up Lore that Stukov was in the early stages of infestation (his reason for his weak broods) and thus the serum worked on him.

    Kerrigan was a perfection by the Overmind. Possible the serum would not work on her, and when there's doubts like these, no one is going to go on an invasion attack to catch her just to have the serum not work. It'll be costly for sure. Valerian is also offering his fleet, something the Protoss would not do for Raynor.

    Q2. Char is a volcanic planet with very high temperature but why is there still rain on this planet?
    No clue, I asked the same question earlier.

  6. #56

    Default Re: All Starcraft 2 Cinematics

    Wasn't it established in Queen of Blades that there was small pools of water scattered across the surface of Char, or am I misremembering the novel?

    It's not like hydrogen and oxygen are that uncommon any way. Water molecules seem bound to form in small amounts everywhere.

  7. #57

    Default Re: All Starcraft 2 Cinematics

    Quote Originally Posted by Pandonetho View Post
    Even Zeratul wants to kill her.
    On the contrary, Zeratul believes that Kerrigan is vital to the survival of the universe.

    Btw, was the SCN64 Resurrection storyline actually canon? I think Metzen has mentioned once that it is but.. just want to make sure. I'd actually prefer that it weren't.

  8. #58

    Default Re: All Starcraft 2 Cinematics

    Quote Originally Posted by Broken_Lamb View Post
    Here's mine =D:

    Horner (I personally find he's the only actor that's shown good acting. he's also got a pretty good character)
    Tychus (His voice is like honey, hardened, then grated.)
    Mengsk (Not as good as in the first game (loved the News Flash bit), but he still has that powerful, awesome voice.)
    Swann (When I heard his voice in 07, I was going to really like him, then I was disappointed when they changed it to Fred's cartoony take in 09. Now he ain't so bad, must've realised how cheesy it was.)
    Horace (I think it's actually his character's facial expression that has pulled this guy down)
    Ariel (Not much on her side, but she did prove to be better than many others)
    Zeratul (Jack Ritschel, may he rest in peace.)
    Nova (didn't hear much of her so we can't really judge)
    Kachinsky (I liked his VA in the BlizzCon 07 vid where they introduced the story mode space, I can tell there's a difference, but he's still better than the below)
    Sarah Kerrigan (would've preferred Talken, but Helfer pulled it off well enough, I'm more concerned for the way she actually looks aesthetically)
    Raynor (*sigh*, Clotworthy's really lost it. I wouldn't blame the dialogue.)
    Queen of Blades (not a prejudice against the VA, she really doesn't sound great, 'cept for the part after she regrows her blades)
    Valerian (I was hoping to like this character.. oh well)
    Tosh (I dunno, when I first heard him at BlizzCon 09, the film clip that was shown had a lot more gravity to it. Now hearing more of Tosh, his VA sounds like he's trying a bit too hard.)
    I think this is a shining example of an unpleasable fanbase. Remember how Blizzard at first didn't want Clotworthy for Raynor? But the fans did so Blizzard gave in. Now that the fans got what they wanted, what do they do? Complain about it. I reckon, had Talken been given the Kerrigan role, people would also be complaining about her performance.

    And in general, people are being overly critical about the voice acting. It's perfectly serviceable! You can understand what they're saying even despite their thick accents. Granted, it's not exactly award-worthy but then again, Blizzard voicework never was. The lines are campy and OTT because that's simply Blizzard's writing style.


    Quote Originally Posted by spychi View Post
    I am bit dissapointed with the plot, we all predicted de-infestation of Kerrigan and at this point I can assume that BLizzard's games are cliche and much repetitive
    we didn't see how it come to that
    That's just silly. People only made the prediction after seeing spoiler information; specifically concept art and leaked screenshots. Hence, all this means is that it seems Blizzard is playing its story straight rather than throwing in a twist at the end. Why is that such a bad thing? Seriously, complaining that Kerrigan is de-infested after seeing concept art for it is like complaining that Valerian Mengsk is actually Arcturus Mengsk's son and not a clone/adopted/a hallucination after it was announced at Blizzcon that Valerian Mengsk was his son.


    Quote Originally Posted by Broken_Lamb View Post
    On the contrary, Zeratul believes that Kerrigan is vital to the survival of the universe.
    When Zeratul seeks Raynor out, he says that Kerrigan deserves to die but she needs to be kept alive; meaning, that he wants her dead but needs her alive.
    Last edited by mr. peasant; 07-25-2010 at 04:05 AM.

  9. #59
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    69

    Default Re: All Starcraft 2 Cinematics

    Quote Originally Posted by Pandonetho View Post
    My theory. Actual reason: Collecting artifacts gives the player more missions to do things instead of just having Raynor up and grab a serum from the Protoss.
    My lore reason: Some of the Protoss may be chummy and friendly with Raynor but I highly doubt that they'd up and help him grab Kerrigan to inject her with a serum. Most Protoss would want to kill her. Even Zeratul wants to kill her. Secondly, is the difficulty of getting to her. I highly doubt it's a trivial matter trying to inject Kerrigan with a nanite serum, considering she's surrounded by billions of Zerg.
    Lastly, the artifact probably provides an easier alternative TO the aforementioned problem. Not only that, it's possible for Blizzard just to throw out some made up Lore that Stukov was in the early stages of infestation (his reason for his weak broods) and thus the serum worked on him.

    Kerrigan was a perfection by the Overmind. Possible the serum would not work on her, and when there's doubts like these, no one is going to go on an invasion attack to catch her just to have the serum not work. It'll be costly for sure. Valerian is also offering his fleet, something the Protoss would not do for Raynor.



    No clue, I asked the same question earlier.
    Oh, very well explained... Also I am just guess one of the other possible reasons of using Xel'Naga Artifacts to de-infest Kerrigan might actually have something to do with the return of Xel'Naga as well? I don't know if Xel'Naga would be interested in possessing Kerrigan's body? It sounds crazy, but considering she's such a perfect example of the Hybrid, it might attract their attention. So who knows what else would happen to Kerrigan again in the future??

  10. #60

    Default Re: All Starcraft 2 Cinematics

    Quote Originally Posted by mr. peasant View Post
    I think this is a shining example of an unpleasable fanbase. Remember how Blizzard at first didn't want Clotworthy for Raynor? But the fans did so Blizzard gave in. Now that the fans got what they wanted, what do they do? Complain about it. I reckon, had Talken been given the Kerrigan role, people would also be complaining about her performance.

    And in general, people are being overly critical about the voice acting. It's perfectly serviceable! You can understand what they're saying even despite their thick accents. Granted, it's not exactly award-worthy but then again, Blizzard voicework never was. The lines are campy and OTT because that's simply Blizzard's writing style.

    When Zeratul seeks Raynor out, he says that Kerrigan deserves to die but she needs to be kept alive; meaning, that he wants her dead but needs her alive.
    1. Haha, I wasn't saying that we should get rid of him, nor was I complaining, I was simply stating that the voice work in SC2 isn't as up to par as it was in the first. Voice acting was one of the key things that made the first game so great. This was simply a list of preference of who had the best voice acting, for example, a top ten list is just rating from best to worst out of those ten, not necessarily the best and terrible. (that didn't sound right.. but oh well)

    Personally I find it funny how it turned out that Clotworthy was brought back and Talken taken away.. I actually was fine when it was Talken + the other actor, he actually DID sound like Clotworthy, just with the stronger accent. And my complaint about dialogue wasn't because of the campy/redneck speech, it was simply a complaint about the dialogue -- not the phrases. I don't know, maybe I'm just used to the great work that was SC1. And don't get me wrong, I still reckon SC2's a great game, it just doesn't have that perfection the first game did (except for the bits of scattered lore, something that may repeat itself because of the less linear story arc in SC2).

    2. Well, yeah that's what I said. I didn't say he WANTED her alive, simply that he believed she was crucial to the universe's survival.

Similar Threads

  1. Anyone have uploads of the cinematics?
    By Wankey in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-22-2010, 10:05 PM
  2. Blizzard Cinematics Department Video
    By Visions of Khas in forum Off-Topic Lounge
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-31-2009, 01:25 PM
  3. Cinematics
    By Perfecttear in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 06-09-2009, 05:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •