
Originally Posted by
Xyvik
First off, these benchmarks for SC2 are so far out of line with my own experiences it's hard to imagine where the numbers came from. Granted, I don't currently (and haven't for some time) have the money to test SC2 on several machines, but I ran benchmarks on client machines before I sent them out.
Put quite simply, in most cases the 768meg GeForce 460 can barely compete with the Radeon 5830, and in no cases have I seen it even coming close to a 5850. The 1gig 460 does better but still can't compete with a 5850.
Also, all this talk of SC2 having problems with ATi cards is just that: talk. I've been running SC2 constantly since beta on 4 different ATi cards, with 3 separate sets of drivers (including a legacy driver) and not only have I had maxed AA but I've had no graphical problems whatsoever. My 5870 has Ultra on everything and AA enabled, so I really have no idea what this article is talking about when it says AA isn't ready on ATi cards...
Quite frankly I have to seriously doubt whether these benchmarks are as unbiased as they'd like to say, because they don't even come close to matching the numbers I benched. Maybe the new nVidia drivers are what makes the difference, because that's the only thing I haven't tested since I currently don't have a client machine with an nVidia card in it.
In short, Fermi is still a massive mistake in terms of architecture. It is too hot and draws too much power for the numbers it puts out, and in a lot of cases it is still too expensive. The 460 is better designed than the 470, 480, and especially the 465, but it still suffers from the basic errors of the Fermi architecture and will never receive a recommendation from me.