Kerrigan picture SC2

[ArcherofAiur]

I hate her face. Its so round she.. shes just not attractive. She looks ugly. She needs to be way, way hotter. Anyone else agree?

Agreed. Her face needs to be skinnier and slighly more angular/striking. The Broodwar box art was perfect.

[XSOLDIER]

This new Kerrigan is just not the same -- her features are so friggin' bland. The real Kerrigan has extreme features that work together to make her look lethally beautiful.

Hidden Content:

I really wish that the facial features matched this a bit more closely.
(It's still awesome though)


X

[Hamshank]

sorry I didn't mean her looks I meant her being sexy lol

[Josue]

I hate her face. Its so round she.. shes just not attractive. She looks ugly. She needs to be way, way hotter. Anyone else agree?

ugly? she's infested, shouldn't she look ugly? anyways, if you mean that rare feeling her face gives... I agree there's something amiss with her face. too bright maybe?

[Warsaw]

ugly? she's infested, shouldn't she look ugly? anyways, if you mean that rare feeling her face gives... I agree there's something amiss with her face. too bright maybe?

Nah. Theres no reason for her to look ugly. she should be hot. Thats whats cool about it. Her face isnt to bright its just a weird shape. Dosnt match up to her unit face from Sc1. Blizzard does a REALLY fabulas job at screwing up with characters

EX would be Arthas good to him going all undead. They changed so much of his faical features, he was a whole new person. Its stupid. IDK what blizzard thinks when they go into a discussion about character design.

"hmmm Kerrigan for sc2? I GOT AN IDEA! Lets change EVERYTHING ABOUT HER! MM KAY!! ^.^!!!!"

[Josue]

Nah. Theres no reason for her to look ugly. she should be hot. Thats whats cool about it. Her face isnt to bright its just a weird shape. Dosnt match up to her unit face from Sc1. Blizzard does a REALLY fabulas job at screwing up with characters

EX would be Arthas good to him going all undead. They changed so much of his faical features, he was a whole new person. Its stupid. IDK what blizzard thinks when they go into a discussion about character design.

"hmmm Kerrigan for sc2? I GOT AN IDEA! Lets change EVERYTHING ABOUT HER! MM KAY!! ^.^!!!!"

maybe, however her lips are too bright, just compare.

Hidden Content:

still hot but ugly as hell as well.

sometimes change isn't as bad.
However if changes goes that further to make them unrecognizable...
for some reason that's something I'm afraid is happening in SCII.

[mr. peasant]

I think the difference we're seeing stems from the transition from 2D into something real. Exaggerations and features that work in art form may not translate well into sculpture and may instead look silly or 'cartoonish'.

[ArcherofAiur]

I think the difference we're seeing stems from the transition from 2D into something real. Exaggerations and features that work in art form may not translate well into sculpture and may instead look silly or 'cartoonish'.

While thats true in some causes I doubt it applys to chubby cheeks.

[Warsaw]

While thats true in some causes I doubt it applys to chubby cheeks.

Hmm ya. And the guyabove has a point to. From Raynors pic I always expected him with chubby cheeks and a unibrow. NOTHING like what he looks like in sc2.

[n00bonicPlague]

The statue isn't too far off.

Just make the eyes a bit more deep-set, the brow more prominent, and the nose thinner and longer.