Is "StarCraft II" ready for release? (Read post before vote)

[Kimera757]

Yes.

Could use a bit more balancing, and cooler zerg spellcasting, but generally yes.

[Eroldren]

Yes, StarCraft WoL is defiantly ready from its long postponed released. That fresh ticking singleplayer campaign lore bombardment ready for us.
Blizzard can and always will continue tinker and play with the multiplayer aspects of SC2. (Finish the main business concerns, fixup in future patches and expansions.) Thats my own simple opinion in the case, mulit can wait the balancing. Blizzard get on with it!

[ArcherofAiur]

"A Blizzard's products readiness should be judged not by how long its been in development, or the fan's impatience but by its quality."

ArcherofAiur, 2010

[DemolitionSquid]

"A Blizzard's products readiness should be judged not by how long its been in development, or the fan's impatience but by its quality."

ArcherofAiur, 2010

Too bad the only people with any idea of the singleplayer's quality are the ones making it.
As is usually the case.

[Gifted]

I am just wondering Gifted if you are planning on doing a similar poll but about Battle.net?

I would consider one, but frankly, there has been at least 4-5 polls on the same nature. On my opinion, a majority of people would vote no and much of what I thought about has been said in 2-3 other prominent threads. So I'm going to skip that poll, I'm sure you understand.

Granted, this poll, I didn't know if everyone was going to say yes or no. Thus why I asked it.

There was no "Yes, it is ALMOST ready - there are still some balance fixes needed" option.

Hence my "No" vote, but technically it is more of a "Yes"

Well, the question is.. "is it ready for release". Granted, this is premature as there is still another phase of beta.. but yeah, I see your point. I would have put a yes in that case, but to each their own

Im still holding out hope for a robot cat vs Roverlisk level.

....

....

/agree

[Eroldren]

"A Blizzard's products readiness should be judged not by how long its been in development, or the fan's impatience but by its quality."

Yeah, but still... Blizzard will remain among the kings of games. I do highly respect both how the makers loyalty wish to make the best, fresh out games etcetera, and still honor their fan's wanting expectations with a awarding product, despite the waits. Thats just me.

[ArcherofAiur]

Yeah, but still... Blizzard will remain among the kings of games.

Blizzard could release Starcraft 2 as a compilation of Dustin Browder sings love ballads and people would still buy it.

[DemolitionSquid]

I'm still bothered by Blizzard choosing to use Tricia Helfer as the voice of Kerrigan instead of bringing back Glynnis Talken. They brought back Robert Clotworthy and James Harper. They even would have brought back Jack Ritschel if he were alive.

It was purely for star power, and it really pisses me off.

[TheEconomist]

Blizzard could release Starcraft 2 as a compilation of Dustin Browder sings love ballads and people would still buy it.

Only because that would be the greatest thing since sliced bread.

@protoswarrior: Are you expecting the game to be perfectly balanced before release? A few balance tweaks is no reason to hold back the game. A reason would be the direction the game is heading or some other problem.

[Gradius]

I'm still bothered by Blizzard choosing to use Tricia Helfer as the voice of Kerrigan instead of bringing back Glynnis Talken. They brought back Robert Clotworthy and James Harper. They even would have brought back Jack Ritschel if he were alive.

It was purely for star power, and it really pisses me off.

But you forget that Tricia can bring out subtle "nuances" that we haven't seen before from Kerrigan. :3

Or something like that. :/