Bashiok discuss chat channels with the community

[BusinessMonkey]

What's a codpiece

But yeah Bashiok is the man. He is quite a nice breee of fresh air compared to all the other mods we have.
I've noticed recently that SC2GDF is calming down, compared to what it used to be.


.

Pretty confusing being called an gay, heavy metal or 15th/16th century piece of clothing with the sole purpose of underlining the size of the male genital area.

But I think the expression slips past our Europeonish sense of humor...

[Dragoonx]

What's a codpiece
But yeah Bashiok is the man. He is quite a nice breeze of fresh air compared to all the other stiff mods we have.
I've also noticed recently that SC2GDF is calming down, compared to what it used to be.


.

What is SC2GDF? I keep seeing it

[Kimera757]

A codpiece is a piece of material which protects the groin.

SC2GDF means "StarCraft II General Discussion Forum" and refers to the official battle.net forum (not, say, this one).

[TheEconomist]

And how many active posters?

8723423 whiners, 37423482349 chronic masturbators, 8927348234 trolls, 8 active posters.

[SlickR]

You would think with the 60$ ($10 more than all PC games ever released) they would be able to cover 5 people to moderate few official chat channels.

As if those $60 weren't enough, one would think that the pay-to-play in russia and other countries they would be able to hire 5 people to moderate the chat channels, but no.

One would think Bobby Kotick is calling all the shots and he money-sucker does not to provide 60$ dollars paying customers few people to moderate and support players in bnet 2.0
Oh and how did blizzard have moderators in bnet 1.0 for 12 years, when they were not even than successful.

Please, if Blizzard continue insulting our intelligence, we should all boycott Starcraft 2.
Lets see who they are going to be selling the next 2 expansions to?

[Dragoonx]

SC2GDF means "StarCraft II General Discussion Forum" and refers to the official battle.net forum (not, say, this one).

In that case I have to agree with most sentiments I hear about it; haha.

As for the Bashiok deal, I'm sure he wishes he could elaborate more on what Blizzard is doing with Chat functions for the future.

[TheEconomist]

60$ ($10 more than all PC games ever released)

You would've been right two years ago but now there's several 60$ games.

[Pandonetho]

Archer got thoroughly owned and ran away? Maybe it's because the mighty robotic unbeatable logical Nicol Bolas showed up to curb stomp him?

Or maybe it's because the god-like revered and perfectly polite Kimera showed up to combat him too?

He knows he fails when even these guys are telling him what's wrong with his logic. Sometimes I wonder if he even looks at what he posts.

Archer: One line question
Poster: Gives a lengthy reply
Archer: Either quotes some random crap and calls it a day, or posts a 1 liner redirecting the topic, OR, makes a new rhetorical question.

Situation 2.

Poster questions Archer on his logic
Archer: Posts a 1 liner question that's unrelated and calls it a day.
Repeat process.

[SlickR]

Like this.


By the way, what he said is more or less what I said here . Really no surprise here. Spam is an issue whether you want to accept it or not. Banning is not enough. You think they don't ban spamers on their forums? Well they do and guess what? They still manage to come back and spam some more even if you ban their cd keys.

oooo, lets get "global" now.
Pedophilia is wrong, so lets cut all men penises, just because few people do it.
stealing is wrong, so lets jail everyone because few do it.

lets not kid ourselves, we are not stupid, idiotic, mindless puppets, we all know spam is no reason to remove chat channels.
And for the sake of argument, say it is, like there is no way to reduce spam to a minimum.

And why hasn't there been spam in all clan channels I've been in WC3?

Again, this is very stupid, lets not allow someone to control us, with few crazy, unlogical lines how they removed chat because of spam, PLEASE!!!

[Dragoonx]

You would think with the 60$ ($10 more than all PC games ever released) they would be able to cover 5 people to moderate few official chat channels.

As if those $60 weren't enough, one would think that the pay-to-play in russia and other countries they would be able to hire 5 people to moderate the chat channels, but no.

One would think Bobby Kotick is calling all the shots and he money-sucker does not to provide 60$ dollars paying customers few people to moderate and support players in bnet 2.0
Oh and how did blizzard have moderators in bnet 1.0 for 12 years, when they were not even than successful.

Please, if Blizzard continue insulting our intelligence, we should all boycott Starcraft 2.
Lets see who they are going to be selling the next 2 expansions to?

PC games have been costing $60 as of late and the boycott idea is beyond ridiculous.