If you could vote again, which Dark Templar?

[Edfishy]

If Blizzard did a new vote for which Dark Templar to use, which would you choose? Classic, SC2, or Both still?




My thoughts:

Hidden Content:

It's just confusing to have two different models for the same unit. The SC2 Dark Templar overall is easier to see and looks more "in-tune" with the role. The strangely weak feeling classic Dark Templar doesn't portray its damage or its unit cost and serves really little purpose.

I'd be interested to see what you all think.

[ArcherofAiur]

I want a Borus DT.

[minerals]

I always thought the double scythe was really clever. Dual wielding daggers is kinda old and overdone.

[Warsaw]

I think both are lame. I would like the SC1 redone to make him look more badass. I hate his stance. I voted for the Sc2 model.

[ArcherofAiur]

Dual wielding daggers is kinda old and overdone.

The zealot has dual daggers. The Classic DT only has one. But ill agree that the double blade green scythe is definatly new territory for Blizzard.

Hidden Content:

[newcomplex]

I really don't like how they did both. It's really asymmetrical with how every other unit in the game works.

[GRUNT]

In my opinion, they're BOTH 'SC2' .

I'm happy with both ^_^. It's a cute exception to the usual rule of a unit only having a single model just for those individualistic DTs .

[Perfecttear]

I prefer the sc2 model, he looks far more intimidating and he has a far superior stance. The sc1 model cloak and stance realy spoil the unit.

[Twilice]

I like both.

[Grrblt]

The classic DT always looked like he used some sort of whip weapon, or a sword that bent when he slashed with it. I want that back.