What if Blizzard gives us all what we want in SC2, but it will take a year to do so?

[n00bonicPlague]

Is this a poll about SC2 or a poll about bnet2?

[Aquanaut]

If Blizzard needs a another year to work on it, then so be it. The compagny aren't the ones who rushed 'till the date and gave the gave half broken ( *cough* Modern Warfare 2 *cough* ) ...

... And as for now, because I haven't yet my new PC to play it anyway.

[silencbank]

This poll/thread is not the average anti Blizz/Activision. anti bnet 2.0 or anti whatever else. This is meant to be a 'what if' scenario. The answers may not cover all of the possible spectrum, but it covers the spectrum I want the answers to. And there really is no point in making a poll if every possible option there could be to any given question.

Personally I am pretty sure it will take more than 1 year to get the game with every little thing people are clamoring about. Hell SC1 took 3 itself to even balance, took longer to put in replays and longer still to add more servers to play on. It is nearly impossible to do everything right in a beta for a RTS game with balancing and all of that included.

So basically do this with the question. Say what you really want is chat rooms. Just insert chat rooms in the question. "If Blizz were going to give us chat rooms, but it would take a year to do it...". Goes the same for whatever issue you have. And just discuss your answer and why you chose it.

It is about whichever n00b, any complaint you have against SC2 or bnet.

[TargetBlue]

I could wait, I have a huge backlog anyways. But if it came out on set date I would get it all the same.

[Jabber Wookie]

I didn't understand the ballot. I demand a recount!

[VVheat]

What is this "we" you are talking about? There is no "we", since "we" all want different things.

A big portion of "we" also doesn't actually know what they want. Lots of the things people claim they want, they will regret once they get it, but may be too proud to admit.

I'm pretty sure this holds true for more than starcraft2.

[MiniMaster184]

I think many people are forgetting that this game wont entirely be "complete" until all 3 games are out.
Yes, I know it only adds to the storyline and for the campaign, but I can see them adding one or two more units in the years to come with balancing and ideas they want to implement.
Besides, think of SC1. That's not even "complete." Just old. ^^

[Maxa]

I would be frustrated, but ultimately accepting, if Blizzard were to develop a truly outstanding game over an extended period. However, it seems clear the Blizzard has little intention to address many of the concerns raise by beta testers, so I don't know if this poll question is really useful.

Moreover, it has become clear that Blizzard has not only made questionable decisions regarding Starcraft 2, but has done so (at least in some cases) with purely fiscal aims in mind. It's one thing if Blizzard makes poor decisions because they honestly believe that doing so will produce the best experience for the gamer, and another entirely if they do so simply in order to gouge the consumer. This latter motivation is really discouraging, not only because it is exploitative, but also because it reinforces the likelihood that Blizzard will not rectify the problems in question at any point in the future. You could argue about whether something like Facebook integration is useful for most players--but if it turns out that Blizzard's sole aim here is just to make an extra buck, well, that ends the discussion.

[spychi]

What if Blizzard listened the first time?

I second that

[VVheat]

Hold on, is this about gameplay or not? Coz I was talking about the gameplay.

Is this a poll about SC2 or a poll about bnet2?

Yeah! So what are we talking about?