Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 39

Thread: Zerg losing its alienness.

  1. #21

    Default Re: Zerg loosing its alienness.

    Quote Originally Posted by Quirel View Post
    Anyone else want the Infested Terran renamed the Terralisk?
    I vote for Terraling.

  2. #22

    Default Re: Zerg losing its alienness.

    You want Zerg alienness?

    Play the singleplay campaign.

  3. #23

    Default Re: Zerg losing its alienness.

    Well, when the leader of your faction goes from a bizarre conscious, super-intelligent hive-mind to, well, just some grumpy human bitch, you tend to lose your alien identity.

  4. #24
    Dale's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    183

    Default Re: Zerg losing its alienness.

    Quote Originally Posted by InpuBot View Post
    In starcraft 1, they had the lisks (Mutalisks, Hydralisks, and Ultralisks,) and zerglings, names that dont mean anything, every time they have added units, it has been a real name, what will happen to lisks.
    The campaign has a Zerg unit named Brutalisk.
    Also, please be more specific with the titles of your threads.

  5. #25

    Default Re: Zerg losing its alienness.

    Quote Originally Posted by InpuBot View Post
    In starcraft 1, they had the lisks (Mutalisks, Hydralisks, and Ultralisks,) and zerglings, names that dont mean anything, every time they have added units, it has been a real name, what will happen to lisks.

    You fail linguistics forever.

    The zerg units with the 'lisk' suffix aren't 'alien'. They are terran names given to them that were more or less descriptive. Same thing goes for various Protoss unit names. You think they actually call dragoons 'dragoons' or phoenixes 'phoenixes' (what the hell would the protoss know about 16th century european mounted infantry or an ancient bird from classical earth mythology?)

  6. #26
    eluadyl's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    65

    Default Re: Zerg losing its alienness.

    Quote Originally Posted by phazonjunkie View Post
    You fail linguistics forever.

    The zerg units with the 'lisk' suffix aren't 'alien'. They are terran names given to them that were more or less descriptive. Same thing goes for various Protoss unit names. You think they actually call dragoons 'dragoons' or phoenixes 'phoenixes' (what the hell would the protoss know about 16th century european mounted infantry or an ancient bird from classical earth mythology?)
    I don't think Protoss need to call their units in any name as they can transmit its whole identity with their minds. When a templar wants to tell another about a zealot, he would not need to put it into words probably

    I don't know why I brought up this quite geeky comment btw

  7. #27

    Default Re: Zerg loosing its alienness.

    Quote Originally Posted by eluadyl View Post
    Another good point

    We don't know what the Zerg call their own units though.
    i was told that the hydralisks are called braahhahahagrrrr and that zerglings are called grraaaaasssskkhhhhht with a silent T

  8. #28

    Default Re: Zerg loosing its alienness.

    Quote Originally Posted by warrior6 View Post
    i was told that the hydralisks are called braahhahahagrrrr and that zerglings are called grraaaaasssskkhhhhht with a silent T
    Quite true.

    However, through a strange blip in xenolinguistics that confused even Douglas Adams, "braahhahahagrrrr" and "grraaaaasssskkhhhhht" are written as "Jackson" and "Wendy", respectively.

  9. #29
    MajinX's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    140

    Default Re: Zerg loosing its alienness.

    Quote Originally Posted by warrior6 View Post
    i was told that the hydralisks are called braahhahahagrrrr and that zerglings are called grraaaaasssskkhhhhht with a silent T
    lol quote for best post of the month. This reminds me of pokemon.. where they are named after the sound they make.

  10. #30

    Default Re: Zerg losing its alienness.

    To me, lisk is something that's big and dangerous. Ling is something that's small and massable.


    ...so where would the roach fall under?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •