Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 58 of 58

Thread: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

  1. #51
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,102

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    Quote Originally Posted by screw_ball69 View Post
    I think I just lost SAN reading that...
    Sorry, what does SAN mean?

    Anyways... there was a topic here somewhere.
    Yeah, Wankey was complaining, despite apparent eyewitness evidence, that the BC was useless.

  2. #52

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    BCs are pretty baller lol

    They melt everything on the ground o.0
    "No matter what side of the argument you are on, you always find people on your side that you wish were on the other."
    Be sure to check out the best #$*&#$ video game show ever Epileptic Gaming and the lastest episode on youtube NOW IN HD
    - Oh its a egg I wonder whats inside! =)

  3. #53

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    Quote Originally Posted by MattII View Post
    Sorry, what does SAN mean?
    SAN. Of which I have little. H̴̷͓̠̙̫͊́ͭ̓̓̓̐͆͗͘E̵̙̣̺͉͉̱̞̻ͩ͂͋͌̀ͧ̅̆̀ ̢̺̗͖̞̥͓̔ͬ̅̎̔ͭ́͢C̶̳̹̳̳̞̻̤̺ͦ̄̽̓̋ͯ̀Ŏ̴͈̺̪̘̠̹͉̗̽Mͤͤ̍ͦ̽ ̦̣̣̻ͧ͢͞Ḙ̢̛̣͚͕̖̦̌ͥ́̅S̨̹̫̬͐͗̐̅̓́͝

    To return to the rapidly sinking ship that is this topic;
    BCs are still, to an extent, capable of the damage they once wrought. They simply deliver this in a different way.
    Last edited by Ghost_828; 05-12-2010 at 12:56 AM.
    Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.

  4. #54
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    74

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    i went mass bc a few times i only go mass bc if i get stuck and turtled

  5. #55
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,102

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost_828 View Post
    SAN. Of which I have little.
    Hey, join the club.

    Returning to the topic. For those who still think the BC isn't useful enough I'll repeat my suggestion from the last page:
    How about if BCs are cheaper than now (say 350/200), but instead of getting Yamato as soon as you research it you have to upgrade each unit individually, for a cost (say an additional 50/100)?

  6. #56
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    157

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    I still believe improved pathing for ground units has effected the chances of air units against them negatively: it's much harder to manage the amount of units attack your air units compared to before, because the ball of ground units has such an easy time attacking your air.
    Last edited by Sietsh-Tenk; 05-12-2010 at 08:23 AM. Reason: Bed gremmur

  7. #57

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    Quote Originally Posted by Wankey View Post
    You watched. How about you play and tell me.
    The guy that played that game was my friend that is less skilled than me, and btw that was my idea, I just told him to do it and he did, and it was pretty pretty easy, so I still don't see your point.
    "Living for the Swarm!"

  8. #58

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    Quote Originally Posted by Wankey View Post
    6 * 1 / .225 = 26dps.

    10 * 1 / .225 = 44dps

    Where on earth do you get the 64dps number from?
    Hahaha, I read that as well and thought "Damn! BCs are that good?"

Similar Threads

  1. The hellion is absolutely useless
    By Wankey in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 05-10-2010, 11:23 AM
  2. Battlecruiser Portrait
    By pure.Wasted in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 04-12-2010, 01:44 AM
  3. Battlecruiser as a support unit
    By Gt2slurp in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 11-01-2009, 02:46 AM
  4. Are banelings useless now?
    By Perfecttear in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 09-03-2009, 02:37 PM
  5. Classic unit showdown #1: Battlecruiser
    By Kimera757 in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-29-2009, 03:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •