Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 58

Thread: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

  1. #21

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    I do agree...the BC is a bit of a money pit. And Vikings are an amazing counter to them, with proper micro. Not to mention a handful--yes only a handful--of upgraded marines. However, two or three BCs backing up a mixed force of other units does give you a nice edge in any engagement.

    I do agree with some past posts that getting a critical mass airforce of BCs is not really all that cost effective when combined forces of different units can do the same job, and probably better.

    The only other thing BCs are really exceptional at is busting up turtle players. You walk two or three in with Yamato and bash in their front door. Then follow that up with a burst or two from a Thor's 250mm guns and kill the enemy's first responders.

    Good rule of thumb I follow with BCs: "Less is usually more."


  2. #22

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    battelecruiser is tragedy..as a carrier

    terrible design

    terrible portrait

    terrible voice

    and very weak...


    edit:adorable model as a design

    http://www.eurobricks.com/forum/inde...howtopic=36465
    Last edited by scorpio19; 05-11-2010 at 10:59 AM.

  3. #23

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    I'll agree that it looks a bit like an inflatable toy, especially with that large bridge on its back.

    I like your channeling energy thrusters idea, Blazur.

  4. #24

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    Quote Originally Posted by Blazur View Post
    That's an interesting idea. Another thought would be to give the ship thrusters which is in essence a channeled ability. While casting it boosts the speed of the ship while depleting its energy reserve.
    Yes I like this idea. But speeding up battlecruisers isn't the problem. They should increase battlecruiser range.

  5. #25
    MajinX's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    140

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    Quote Originally Posted by Wankey View Post
    Yes I like this idea. But speeding up battlecruisers isn't the problem. They should increase battlecruiser range.
    wat is the current range? and if u have speed boosters, u can get in range quite quickly and then escape when needed, rather than have a slightly higher range but not being able to micro when about to die

  6. #26

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    BC
    HP: 550
    Armor: 3
    Min:400
    Gas:300
    Supply: 6
    Time: 90

    Yamoto Cannon Upgrade
    Dmg: 300
    Energy: 125
    Min: 150
    Gas: 150
    Time: 60

    Fusion Core
    HP: 750
    Min: 150
    Gas: 150
    Time: 65

    We can mostly agree the problem is that BC's aren't worth getting without Yamoto, kind of like how Zealots aren't worth getting without Charge.

    IMHO, late game units shouldn't need upgrades. They should be viable right out the gate. Upgrades are to help weaker, early game units stay useful as the game progresses and more powerful units are put on the field. If you're rushing to BC's or Carriers or Ultralisks, do you normally skip their upgrades? Not really. If you're investing to get these strong units fast, so you might as well spend the few extra resources to make them as strong as possible as fast as possible. And when you'll be building them again later in the game you'll already be set. On the flip side, once you're getting these late game units, you usually can quickly shell out the fraction of their cost on their upgrades because you'll have a stronger economy. Either way, no one builds BC's without Yamoto in mind.

    So here's my suggestion: remove the need to upgrade Yamoto Cannon. Make it inherent from the very first BC you produce. Maybe balance it by reducing the BC's HP to 500 and armor to 2, or increasing its build time.

    Right now we're thinking and designing it as, "I need Yamoto, so unfortunately I have to get BC's." What we should be thinking and designing is "I need Yamoto, and in getting it I get access to a strong air unit too." Simply making Yamoto more accessible would help a lot.

  7. #27

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    I like mixing them with my forces, but I never make more than a couple of them unless I have Ravens to back them up. With a group of BC's, point defense drones and a couple of heat seekers throw in, you're in for a lot of trouble!

    I honestly think the BC and the Carrier are best used as compliment units than they are massable units. I think it's Blizzard's WarCraft 3 syndrome that's causing that as well.

  8. #28

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    Mixing BCs with Raven's spell that stops missiles is sure win.

  9. #29

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    Quote Originally Posted by GRUNT View Post
    At 300 minerals 200 gas, you'd think that the Thor would be considered the Colossi of Terrans .

    I've actually seen BCs used to amazing effect in a high-level ZvT. Unfortunately, I don't have the replay because it was on someone's stream (http://www.livestream.com/charella). This Zerg player is #1 in his platinum division, and he's very good. I can't remember the day the game was played, but it's with the current patch.
    The rank doesn't tell you much, the rating does. Just throwing it out there.
    Hey guys I want you all to know that my team is playing/did great this weekend so I am going to go ahead and make it my status because I know you all care and want to know my opinion on it.
    -sports fan/douchebag


    Visit my blog!
    http://alejandrolc.com/

  10. #30
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    175

    Default Re: Battlecruiser, a useless unit.

    I agree with demolitionsquid's idea, once BCs have yatamo they become incredibly more useful, even in small numbers. Making it so that it is not an upgrade would be a great help in increasing BC popularity and they are late enough in the tech tree that this wouldn't be a big issue.

    As it is now... I use BCs from time to time (make excellent tanks/support and can force an opponent to produce way too much air d (have to have ravens to aid them though)), mostly in tvt or tvp. Infestors, hydras and corruptors kill most of the uses they would have in tvz though.

Similar Threads

  1. The hellion is absolutely useless
    By Wankey in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 05-10-2010, 11:23 AM
  2. Battlecruiser Portrait
    By pure.Wasted in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 04-12-2010, 01:44 AM
  3. Battlecruiser as a support unit
    By Gt2slurp in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 11-01-2009, 02:46 AM
  4. Are banelings useless now?
    By Perfecttear in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 09-03-2009, 02:37 PM
  5. Classic unit showdown #1: Battlecruiser
    By Kimera757 in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-29-2009, 03:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •