Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 52

Thread: Why not give the Carrier a weakened planet-cracker?

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    157

    Default Why not give the Carrier a weakened planet-cracker?

    A planet-cracker style weapon beamed directly underneath dealing 20 dps or so for five seconds. It stacks with other beams.

    Mana cost 100, maybe 125 or even 150 if balance calls for it.

    As we have seen, the Carrier is extremely underused. This ability would give a carrier the option to wipe out a mineral line, deal 1200 damage to a single building in 5 seconds or deal mobile AoE on the battlefield.

    It fits with the lore and it would be cool and useful.

    Of course, I can already hear the screams of "overlap" "collossus" and "psi storm"! This is all true. It's just an idea, but we need something to beef up the Carrier.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Why not give the Carrier a weakened planet-cracker?

    How about something like the beam from the First Contact cinematic? Could have it pierce through multiple air units if they're lined up.
    - You've seen StarCraft: First Contact -

    - Now, prepare for the Final Metamorphosis -


  3. #3
    Centipede's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    123

    Default Re: Why not give the Carrier a weakened planet-cracker?

    I don't use the Carrier because it's so ugly.

    Protoss certainly could use something to beef up their air power a bit, though, I agree.

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    157

    Default Re: Why not give the Carrier a weakened planet-cracker?

    Quote Originally Posted by Freespace View Post
    How about something like the beam from the First Contact cinematic? Could have it pierce through multiple air units if they're lined up.
    You mean like a kind of Hellion attack, but air-only, higher in damage and activated through energy? Sounds cool. It would be hard to micro though with carriers being pretty slow, so it should have high damage in bursts to make it effective.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Why not give the Carrier a weakened planet-cracker?

    I agree , but then we should also give Battlecruisers nuclear bombs
    It also fits with the lore and it to would be cool and useful... ^^
    Last edited by Perfecttear; 04-15-2010 at 07:15 AM.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Why not give the Carrier a weakened planet-cracker?

    I would prefer that the Phoenix gets buffed instead of this. The Carrier is pretty powerful already, even if it looks like a mess of twisted wires.

    Quote Originally Posted by Centipede View Post
    I don't use the Carrier because it's so ugly.

    Protoss certainly could use something to beef up their air power a bit, though, I agree.
    First thing i will do about the Carrier is to look for a mod to show it as the Project Revolution model.

  7. #7
    Maul's Avatar Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,218

    Default Re: Why not give the Carrier a weakened planet-cracker?

    Quote Originally Posted by Perfecttear View Post
    I agree , but then we should also give Battlecruisers nuclear bombs
    It also fits with the lore and it to would be cool and useful... ^^
    Oh, a sarcasm detector. That's a very useful invention. *detector explodes*
    I really need to change this...
    Check out my maps: Maul's Spirial Turret Defense and Maul's Risk: Bel'shir

  8. #8

    Default Re: Why not give the Carrier a weakened planet-cracker?

    Quote Originally Posted by Perfecttear View Post
    I agree , but then we should also give Battlecruisers nuclear bombs
    It also fits with the lore and it to would be cool and useful... ^^
    That's why they invented the Yamato cannon-precision clean and still powerfull explosion that can be used both vs ground and in space combat-the yamato uses intense magnetic field that forces nuclear detonation(according to lore)...BUT i still don't understand how a powerful weapon like that will kill a single zergling and not hurt the other 1 feet away ,that why it requires splash damage...

    As for the Carrier,Hmm,considering they have 8 range and super fast fleet of interceptors,i don't think aditional damage will fit in...

  9. #9

    Default Re: Why not give the Carrier a weakened planet-cracker?

    Quote Originally Posted by arthas View Post
    BUT i still don't understand how a powerful weapon like that will kill a single zergling and not hurt the other 1 feet away ,that why it requires splash damage...
    Is has splash damage. But no one is dumb enough to shoot Lings with Yamato

  10. #10

    Default Re: Why not give the Carrier a weakened planet-cracker?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kknewkles View Post
    Is has splash damage. But no one is dumb enough to shoot Lings with Yamato
    IF it had splash do you think i will be saying that? sadly it doesn't have splash...

Similar Threads

  1. The great Carrier debacle
    By Wankey in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 02-21-2010, 10:18 PM
  2. Old Carrier vs New Carrier
    By ArcherofAiur in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 227
    Last Post: 02-02-2010, 03:26 PM
  3. Carrier death => suicidal Interceptors
    By n00bonicPlague in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 11-18-2009, 01:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •