
Originally Posted by
Nicol Bolas
If we're so "stupid", please explain why the correct course of action, the best possible thing he could have done under the circumstances was to do what he did.
There is one simple fact that you don't seem to understand: fighting with half your army is almost always worse than fighting with all of it. The only time this is not true is if you're fighting a delaying action, holding the enemy off until your defenses are in place or your next wave can deal with the issue.
The Zerg player was not fighting a delaying action. Indeed, he could not be, because the Protoss player walled himself off from the natural. That meant that, while the non-burrow move Roaches were unable to shoot at the Stalkers and Sentries, so too were the non-Blinking Stalkers unable to attack the actual base. The Protoss player created a stand-off, one that was guaranteed to last until the FFs gave out.
In short, there was already a delay in the Protoss attack, caused by the Protoss player himself.
Therefore, the sacrifice of the Mutalisks when they jumped across the FF barrier was utterly pointless. Attacking with half your units is not as effective as attacking with all of them.
Even if the situation was utterly hopeless, as you suggest, then the correct course of action is to GG, not to piss away half your units for no gain.