Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 61

Thread: Triangle of death

  1. #51

    Default Re: Triangle of death

    Are banelings being factored into this 'triangle' of death? Don't they play an important role as anti-lings?

  2. #52

    Default Re: Triangle of death

    Quote Originally Posted by RamiZ View Post
    That would be only if you got a lot more Zerglings/Hydras then he got Roaches, also Roaches with Burrow are just evil units, they are probably my favorite SC2 Zerg units...And if you put few banelings they will destroy all that Zerglings... Not that Good overall...
    Well, let's see.

    Assuming the Hydralisk has the same, or very similar stats to SC1, now that they are tier 1 again. You can get about the same number of Hydralisks as they get roaches, depending on the cost of the Roach Warren vs the Hydralisk Den.

    Hydralisks do 10 damage a hit. So you need at least 10 hydralisks to kill the roaches in a single volley. Roaches do 16 damage a hit, so you need about 7 to kill a hydralisk in a single volley. But Hydralisks have double the range, are smaller (I think?) and move faster (I think?). So they have those advantages, their DPS will probably be overall higher.

    It probably works similarly to Stalkers vs. Roaches. The more units involved, the better the Hydralisks perform. But Hydralisks aren't as effective a counter as Stalkers in that they aren't mechanical, they're biological... so...

    Really I think when it comes down to it, a MASS all-in roach strategy is best countered by playing defensively and building spine crawlers and a queen.

    Quote Originally Posted by Triceron View Post
    Are banelings being factored into this 'triangle' of death? Don't they play an important role as anti-lings?
    Not... really, Roaches already counter lings for cost fairly effectively. Plus if they moved Hydralisks down a tier, they moved Banelings up one to compensate.
    Last edited by Aldrius; 05-11-2009 at 03:36 PM.


    The Mother of all Queens!

    Thanks to Dynamik- for the signature!

  3. #53
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,102

    Default Re: Triangle of death

    They could move Roaches up a tier and give them a small stats boost.

  4. #54

    Default Re: Triangle of death

    Quote Originally Posted by MattII View Post
    They could move Roaches up a tier and give them a small stats boost.
    Nah, i like it this way and i think it is better....

    Quote Originally Posted by Aldrius
    But Hydralisks have double the range, are smaller (I think?) and move faster (I think?)
    Nope, Hydras are Larger then Roaches and are fast as Roaches, conclusion after BR2, also you forgot that Hydras cost Gas and Roaches dont...So for later units if you go Hydras vs Roaches, he can get some other Gas efficient units(Mutalisks) and you will probably spend too much gas on Hydras...

  5. #55
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,102

    Default Re: Triangle of death

    Maybe the Roach cost ought to be made 75/25, rather than 100/0, that ought to curb massive numbers in the early game.

  6. #56

    Default Re: Triangle of death

    Quote Originally Posted by Aldrius View Post
    Not... really, Roaches already counter lings for cost fairly effectively. Plus if they moved Hydralisks down a tier, they moved Banelings up one to compensate.
    Is this an assumption?

    Why would banelings have to be moved up tech if the Hydralisk is brought down? The baneling has a pretty solid role in early game despite the Roach being readily available. The baneling isn't exactly overlapping any specific role the Hydralisk plays tier 1.5. It is neither a roach killer, nor an anti-air unit, nor a ranged support unit. It's a mass bio unit killer. It plays a similar role to the Roach, but is much more effective offensively rather than winning through attrition.

  7. #57

    Default Re: Triangle of death

    Quote Originally Posted by Triceron View Post
    Is this an assumption?
    An educated assumption, yes.

    Why would banelings have to be moved up tech if the Hydralisk is brought down? The baneling has a pretty solid role in early game despite the Roach being readily available. The baneling isn't exactly overlapping any specific role the Hydralisk plays tier 1.5. It is neither a roach killer, nor an anti-air unit, nor a ranged support unit. It's a mass bio unit killer. It plays a similar role to the Roach, but is much more effective offensively rather than winning through attrition.
    Every race has three tier 1 combat units.

    And the last time they changed the hydralisk, they moved the baneling up a tier.

    Nope, Hydras are Larger then Roaches and are fast as Roaches, conclusion after BR2, also you forgot that Hydras cost Gas and Roaches dont...So for later units if you go Hydras vs Roaches, he can get some other Gas efficient units(Mutalisks) and you will probably spend too much gas on Hydras...
    Well. I wouldn't say either can be judged too specifically in regards to size/speed, but I highly doubt the Roach doesn't cost gas. Or won't cost gas when the game comes out.


    The Mother of all Queens!

    Thanks to Dynamik- for the signature!

  8. #58

    Default Re: Triangle of death

    Roaches are Armored. Hydras are Light.
    Decepticons, transform and rise up!

  9. #59
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,335

    Default Re: Triangle of death

    Quote Originally Posted by Pandonetho View Post
    SC wiki says 90 hp.

    I trust SC wiki more than any site, but it's possible it's outdated.
    Hehe - I was actually the one who edited the Hydralisk HP entry on the SC wiki after watching the battlereport .

    The Hydralisk's HP may have changed since then, but that's what it was in BR2 - our most recent source of HP info for that unit.

  10. #60

    Default Re: Triangle of death

    Quote Originally Posted by GRUNT View Post
    Hehe - I was actually the one who edited the Hydralisk HP entry on the SC wiki after watching the battlereport .

    The Hydralisk's HP may have changed since then, but that's what it was in BR2 - our most recent source of HP info for that unit.
    Oh LOL ok im going to edit it to 150, im sure it will PWN

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •