No, it isn't. The Immortal requires the Twilight Council (replaces the Citadel in the tree). Stalkers only need the Cybernetics Core.and you should have mentioned the immortal as it is buildable at the same time as the stalker
Results 11 to 20 of 61
Thread: Triangle of death
-
05-09-2009, 12:38 PM
#11
Member
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 2,664
Re: Triangle of death
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." - C. S. Lewis
"You simply cannot design a mechanic today to mimic the behaviour of a 10-year old mechanic that you removed because nearly nobody would like them today." - Norfindel, on the Macro Mechanics
"We want to focus the player on making interesting choices and not just a bunch of different klicks." - Dustin Browder
StarCraft 2 Beta Blog
-
05-09-2009, 12:45 PM
#12
Member
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 1,566
Re: Triangle of death
You forgot that Hydra has Burrow and also in this "version" got 90Hp
Originally Posted by Perfecttear
-
05-09-2009, 01:06 PM
#13
Member
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 1,555
Re: Triangle of death
Starcraft2 armory says it has 80 hp. Originally Posted by RamiZ
Starcraftwire says it has 80 hp.
Where did you get 90 hp?
-
05-09-2009, 01:08 PM
#14
SC:L Addict
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 5,214
Re: Triangle of death
SC wiki says 90 hp.
I trust SC wiki more than any site, but it's possible it's outdated.
-
05-09-2009, 01:27 PM
#15
Member
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 2,446
Re: Triangle of death
In the battle report I think it had 90 hp.
Anyway, since it's been changed to tier 1, no stats are dependable, there's no way they'd leave it as it was in regards to stats.
And for me, I'd like to see them try and avoid giving Zerg too many damage-bonuses, just because it's always been something they've avoided for the most part. But it seems unavoidable in the Hydra's case.
As for stats, a layout of:
75/25/1
8 damage (+2 vs. Armored) vs. Air and Ground
With 80 hp sounds good to me.
Pretty much what it had in SC1, except it's base damage is higher.
-
05-09-2009, 02:05 PM
#16
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 1,555
Re: Triangle of death
Hydra needs to get a damage bonus or cost less or get more hp to be usefull. I vote for the first, sice then it can counter the roach and fix zvz.
Last edited by Perfecttear; 05-09-2009 at 02:07 PM.
-
05-09-2009, 03:25 PM
#17
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 1,566
Re: Triangle of death
I think that banelings could counter Roaches just fine in ZvZ, especially with Burrow in SC2
Ambush FTW!
Also yeah Hydras got 90 Hp in BR2.
-
05-09-2009, 03:30 PM
#18
Member
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 4,563
Re: Triangle of death
Vote for early tier 2 Lurkers to stop Roaches!
Come on... it would be so awesome.
-
05-09-2009, 03:34 PM
#19
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 1,566
Re: Triangle of death
They would be too powerful in ZvT and ZvP, so no, but i thtink that hydras are good counter to them, especially combined with Banelings Originally Posted by pure.Wasted
Vote for early tier 2 Lurkers to stop Roaches!
Come on... it would be so awesome.
-
05-09-2009, 03:35 PM
#20
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 4,563
Re: Triangle of death
How would they be too powerful if their stats were brought down to tier 2 along with their production? o.O Originally Posted by RamiZ
They would be too powerful in ZvT and ZvP, so no, but i thtink that hydras are good counter to them, especially combined with Banelings
Reply With Quote
