Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 88

Thread: Do you love how Battlecruiser looks?

  1. #11

    Default Re: Do you love how Battlecruiser looks?

    I don't like the new battle cruiser's attack. It should fire volleys. I've never seen a battlecruiser fire its guns one at a time, it doesn't make sense from a gunnery point of view.

  2. #12

    Default Re: Do you love how Battlecruiser looks?

    I think the Hyperion from the main menu looks awesome, they should just downres that and use it.

  3. #13

    Default Re: Do you love how Battlecruiser looks?

    Where'd the hell did you find that!??!!??!?

  4. #14

    Default Re: Do you love how Battlecruiser looks?

    I cant put my finger on it, but there has been a definite improvement since the multi upgrade "blow up toy" version BC of some months back. The one Triceron posted is pretty sweet, but almost looks like a "Borg" BC or something
    "Wait.....no Gzhee-Gzhee.....?.....whu......Why no Ghzhee-Gzhee?!?!?!?!"


    RIP - Leslie Nielsen

  5. #15

    Default Re: Do you love how Battlecruiser looks?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wankey View Post
    Where'd the hell did you find that!??!!??!?
    Um....

    Here and Here.....

    I've had the first one as my desktop background for awhile now.....

    How is this new info? They can't use it anyways. The Hyperion is a different class than the new battle cruiser being constructed for the Dominion.

    Im glad that they fixed the attachment on the wings now though.
    Last edited by Shadow Archon; 03-03-2010 at 10:24 PM.

  6. #16

    Default Re: Do you love how Battlecruiser looks?

    I'm actually not a fan of the new Battlecruiser, either in-game or pre-rendered cinematic versions. The original was much more iconic because, I think, it was comparatively simple in design. In the cinematics, the neck of the thing was broken up into discernible sections, and the fore was much smoother and less cluttered. The in-game render in SC2 reminds me too much of the bulkiness and unwieldiness of the Thor.

    I think the parts that are bothering me are the conning tower over the engines, and the giant assembly surrounding this gaping hole that represents the yamato cannon. I think it could use some a re-touch to unify the assembly of elements.


    That said... the picture Triceron showed is an absolute, sexy beast of a machine. It reminds me too much of a vessel from The Matrix because of the profusion of conduits and small parts, along with the all the black and gun metal grey... but it's sexy nonetheless. I salivated over that for about two minutes straight.
    Aaand sold.


    Be it through hallowed grounds or lands of sorrow
    The Forger's wake is bereft and fallow

    Is the residuum worth the cost of destruction and maiming;
    Or is the shaping a culling and exercise in taming?

    The road's goal is the Origin of Being
    But be wary through what thickets it winds.

  7. #17

    Default Re: Do you love how Battlecruiser looks?

    Battlecruiser is a slow slow unit, god it annoys me to death how freaking slow they are, and where the hell is my Dmatrix upgrade ahh FUUUUUUUUUUUU


    Oh yeah, how it loooks umm yeah I love it One of the best looking flyers imo
    "No matter what side of the argument you are on, you always find people on your side that you wish were on the other."
    Be sure to check out the best #$*&#$ video game show ever Epileptic Gaming and the lastest episode on youtube NOW IN HD
    - Oh its a egg I wonder whats inside! =)

  8. #18

    Default Re: Do you love how Battlecruiser looks?

    Quote Originally Posted by Visions of Khas
    I'm actually not a fan of the new Battlecruiser, either in-game or pre-rendered cinematic versions. The original was much more iconic because, I think, it was comparatively simple in design. In the cinematics, the neck of the thing was broken up into discernible sections, and the fore was much smoother and less cluttered. The in-game render in SC2 reminds me too much of the bulkiness and unwieldiness of the Thor.
    The Hyperion is special however. It could be either heavily modified or upgraded. If the Terran government can build something like Coruscant in four years from a desert planet, than a rebel group which might have support can definitely upgrade a ship drastically in four years. They might bring back old Behemoth classes in the game.

  9. #19

    Default Re: Do you love how Battlecruiser looks?

    That's what I was thinking. It possesses a cobbled-together feel to it, which would be suitable for the Hyperion.
    Aaand sold.


    Be it through hallowed grounds or lands of sorrow
    The Forger's wake is bereft and fallow

    Is the residuum worth the cost of destruction and maiming;
    Or is the shaping a culling and exercise in taming?

    The road's goal is the Origin of Being
    But be wary through what thickets it winds.

  10. #20

    Default Re: Do you love how Battlecruiser looks?

    It's the Hyperion from the main menu of the SC2 login screen.

Similar Threads

  1. You guys will love this - new protoss macro mechanic in the works
    By ArcherofAiur in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 12-04-2009, 09:37 PM
  2. Battlecruiser as a support unit
    By Gt2slurp in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 11-01-2009, 02:46 AM
  3. For the love of God fix the countdown system...
    By Wankey in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-12-2009, 05:42 PM
  4. Classic unit showdown #1: Battlecruiser
    By Kimera757 in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-29-2009, 03:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •