Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 47

Thread: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

  1. #31

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    Quote Originally Posted by Krikkitone View Post
    Hopefully after one of the expansions, the Dark Shrine will contain the upgrades allowing the Archons to act as "Grey Archons" and have abilities.
    Is that inspired by the fanfiction "Grey Templar?" They would be greenish instead of blue or red?

  2. #32

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    I agree with OP. Dark Shrine need to have research for Stalkers, Archons and Dark Templars(or at least for some of them).

    They could research for Dark Templars to have increased Attack Speed. Archons to get high Splash, or bonus to something. Maybe some spell. Stalkers could get reduce Blink Cooldown by 2 sec, or giving it range +1.

    Those are just examples, but they could do something like that, I hope that this is only in Beta.
    "Living for the Swarm!"

  3. #33

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    Those upgrades are kinda lame.

    They've done a really good job making all the upgrades feel like big, powerful boosts, but not necessarily REQUIRED to use the unit.

    In most cases anyway.

    I kinda think the Archon should have feedback instead of the High Templar...


    The Mother of all Queens!

    Thanks to Dynamik- for the signature!

  4. #34

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    Quote Originally Posted by Aldrius View Post
    Those upgrades are kinda lame.

    They've done a really good job making all the upgrades feel like big, powerful boosts, but not necessarily REQUIRED to use the unit.

    In most cases anyway.

    I kinda think the Archon should have feedback instead of the High Templar...
    Yeah, I liked them when they had Feedback, they did in one stage of an Alpha build. Don't know, maybe they were Overpowered. They need one ability for sure.

    And also, those upgrades aren't necessary. They are actually pretty much as other unit upgrades.
    "Living for the Swarm!"

  5. #35

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    Quote Originally Posted by RamiZ View Post
    And also, those upgrades aren't necessary. They are actually pretty much as other unit upgrades.
    They're not necessary, just not decisive. A Stalker with a reduced blink cooldown or an extra range point isn't going to make a huge, huge difference. The other examples are just too arbitrary.


    The Mother of all Queens!

    Thanks to Dynamik- for the signature!

  6. #36

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    Quote Originally Posted by Aldrius View Post
    They're not necessary, just not decisive. A Stalker with a reduced blink cooldown or an extra range point isn't going to make a huge, huge difference. The other examples are just too arbitrary.
    How about not making Stalkers need air support to blink up a cliff with an upgrade?

  7. #37

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    im not quite buying in to the "DT's are still awsome" tehy are expensive fragile units in an enfiroment thats generally more hostile than in sc1 all-be-it with mroe scarece detection (at least for zerg) ... this and the readability of DT tech warrants some kind of boost - rather from an upgrade than from the get-go, esp as the shrine doesnt have one.

    that said, i definately feel the dark-srine should stay. the potential readability of DT tech should be good for teh game, so long as DT's arnt too weak.

    Quote Originally Posted by Krikkitone View Post
    Well perhaps, to improve the Dark Shrine's 'readability' it could be cloaked.
    this could be cool, maybe an upgrade to claok it? and anotehr upgrade, eitehr to the DT or sth else cool like feedback on the archon. (may have been removed for a reason but would be cool to see tried in beta & current archons look quite weak)
    I am an enthusiast of good strategy games, sc2Esports and rollplay, although i dont really play anything atm.
    I work an internship at a government agency this fall, and have a good time at it.
    I'm being more social, active and honest lately. in all forums.

    Hi.

  8. #38

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    im not quite buying in to the "DT's are still awsome"
    Well, they are. They most certainly don't need an upgrade. Though having one might be cool.


    The Mother of all Queens!

    Thanks to Dynamik- for the signature!

  9. #39

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    The Archives were split into Archives and Shrine to make a bigger tech choice and give access to each unit (HHT or DT) faster/cheaper at the expense of the other. I think giving the Shrine some sort of DT upgrade would be best, just like upgrades for the HT. A damage upgrade would work.

  10. #40

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    relevant to the subject is that DT apparently isnt labled as light n'or armored.. is it psionic? surely its biological?
    I am an enthusiast of good strategy games, sc2Esports and rollplay, although i dont really play anything atm.
    I work an internship at a government agency this fall, and have a good time at it.
    I'm being more social, active and honest lately. in all forums.

    Hi.

Similar Threads

  1. Dark shrine seems to be a very boring building
    By Wankey in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 11-11-2009, 09:11 PM
  2. Are they dead?
    By Perfecttear in forum Off-Topic Lounge
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-11-2009, 12:25 AM
  3. Wall of the Dead
    By Dauntless in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-23-2009, 05:24 PM
  4. Sam Raimi (Evil Dead, Spider-man) to direct WoW?
    By Edfishy in forum Off-Topic Lounge
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 08-01-2009, 01:09 AM
  5. Dawn of the Dead - StarCraft
    By strikesback5 in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-09-2009, 05:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •