Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 47

Thread: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    373

    Default Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    (Bare in mind I don't play Protoss.)

    The Dark Shrine doesn't research or upgrade anything for itself, nor does it unlock any new tech beyond Dark Templar. Is this acceptable? It sure doesn't feel right. It just sits there - it's a dead building. There's nothing else in SC2 or BW that feels quite so useless once built.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    This is first week of beta. Wait a while and listen.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,335

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    Quote Originally Posted by milo View Post
    (Bare in mind I don't play Protoss.)

    The Dark Shrine doesn't research or upgrade anything for itself, nor does it unlock any new tech beyond Dark Templar. Is this acceptable? It sure doesn't feel right. It just sits there - it's a dead building. There's nothing else in SC2 or BW that feels quite so useless once built.
    Queen's Nest can give the Dark Shrine a run for its money .

    At least you don't have to get the Dark Shrine if you don't want to go for DTs, but if you want Hive tech, you need to get a Queen's Nest even if you don't plan on buildings Queens...and Queens are almost never actually built .

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    373

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wankey View Post
    This is first week of beta. Wait a while and listen.
    This response does not apply to this discussion. No beta testing whatsoever is required to show that the Dark Shrine does nothing more than unlock DT's.

    I'm wondering whether Toss players/people in general are OK with this.

    Quote Originally Posted by GRUNT View Post
    Queen's Nest can give the Dark Shrine a run for its money .

    At least you don't have to get the Dark Shrine if you don't want to go for DTs, but if you want Hive tech, you need to get a Queen's Nest even if you don't plan on buildings Queens...and Queens are almost never actually built .
    Queens Nest researches Queen abilities. And while they are rarely used, they still have their moments to shine in BW.

    Terrans still have to get Raxes even if they're meching, or Factories even if they're not.

    A more accurate comparison would be Ultralisk Cavern in vanilla SC (no speed or armor upgrade back then) or if SC2 required a 'Thor Building' that did nothing but unlock Thors.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,335

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    Quote Originally Posted by milo View Post


    Queens Nest researches Queen abilities. And while they are rarely used, they still have their moments to shine in BW.

    And DTs don't? I'm pretty sure DTs will see more action in SC2 than Queens did in BW.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    I definitely feel the Shrine could be better utilized.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    What would you suggest? A dark templar specific upgrade (eg extra damage, speed, something like that)?

    Is there anything that dark templar need? (I could also picture upgrades for stalkers or void rays, although that's more lore than gameplay, given how far apart these all are on the tech tree.)
    StarCraft wiki; a complete and referenced database on the StarCraft game series, StarCraft II, Lore, Characters and Gameplay, and member of the StarCraft II Fansite Program.

    "Do you hear them whispering from the stars? The galaxy will burn with their coming."

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    373

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    Quote Originally Posted by GRUNT View Post
    And DTs don't? I'm pretty sure DTs will see more action in SC2 than Queens did in BW.
    You're missing my point. Once you get a Queens Nest, you can research Queen abilities and proceed to Hive tech.

    Once you get a Dark Shrine, you can get DT's.

    That's it.

    As is, it's an artificial attempt at forcing the Toss to have tech diversity.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    Quote Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post
    I definitely feel the Shrine could be better utilized.
    Ditto. I think I've only built one once or twice out of 120+ games on the ladder.
    Last edited by Hav0x; 03-01-2010 at 07:14 PM.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Dark Shrine: a dead building?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hav0x View Post
    Ditto. I think I've only built one once or twice out of ~100 games on the ladder.
    So not what I meant.

    I use DT's all the time, they're fantastic. The Shrine just needs to stop being so bland. At least the Twilight Counsel serves a greater purpose than the Citadel of Adun ever did.

Similar Threads

  1. Dark shrine seems to be a very boring building
    By Wankey in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 11-11-2009, 09:11 PM
  2. Are they dead?
    By Perfecttear in forum Off-Topic Lounge
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-11-2009, 12:25 AM
  3. Wall of the Dead
    By Dauntless in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-23-2009, 05:24 PM
  4. Sam Raimi (Evil Dead, Spider-man) to direct WoW?
    By Edfishy in forum Off-Topic Lounge
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 08-01-2009, 01:09 AM
  5. Dawn of the Dead - StarCraft
    By strikesback5 in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-09-2009, 05:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •