StarCraft II Artwork Thread

[Zero]

That battlecruiser is missing its command bridge. It should be located toward the back, raised up from the center of the ship.

[imdrunkontea]

The old sc1 battlecruisers did not have a raised command bridge. Only the new sc2 ones do (and, for some reason, the Hyperion).

[DemolitionSquid]

Human ships are so inefficiently designed. The Covenant and Turians had the right idea - the bridge should be housed safely in the middle.

[Pandonetho]

That battlecruiser is missing its command bridge. It should be located toward the back, raised up from the center of the ship.

You really wonder how they look at stuff that's beneath them (the battlecruiser) with the command bridge located where it is. Unless of course it's all through cameras and what not.

Human ships are so inefficiently designed. The Covenant and Turians had the right idea - the bridge should be housed safely in the middle.

Rule of Cool.

[DemolitionSquid]

Rule of Cool.

I find Protoss ships far cooler than anything the Terran have.

[scorpio19]

[Pandonetho]

I find Protoss ships far cooler than anything the Terran have.

Both species have cool air ship designs.

[DemolitionSquid]

Both species have cool air ship designs.

I fully disagree. I find Terran extremely boring. They have cool mechanics, like the Viking being able to transform, but the designs are uninspired.

[imdrunkontea]

personally, i like the rugged feel of the Terran ships. practical and tough.

if the carrier didn't have shields, its hull would crack much more easily than a BC's thick hide.

[DemolitionSquid]

personally, i like the rugged feel of the Terran ships. practical and tough.

if the carrier didn't have shields, its hull would crack much more easily than a BC's thick hide.

I'm sure the Protoss have access to far more durable materials than Terran.