02-04-2010, 02:40 PM
#21
02-04-2010, 02:40 PM
#22
02-04-2010, 03:55 PM
#23
Kadaj brings up a good point. For some reason, I can't envision this being a small unit. Nor would it look quite right if it were very large.
It's a cumbersome thing.
Aaand sold.
Be it through hallowed grounds or lands of sorrow
The Forger's wake is bereft and fallow
Is the residuum worth the cost of destruction and maiming;
Or is the shaping a culling and exercise in taming?
The road's goal is the Origin of Being
But be wary through what thickets it winds.
02-04-2010, 04:09 PM
#24
The new model is too shiny... the blue mineral crystals already hurt my eyeballs.
Hi. My name is SenTrY. and i LuV to carry 'RounD my Blue GloBe.
02-04-2010, 04:33 PM
#25
02-04-2010, 04:40 PM
#26
No, it doesn't. There is a lot about the model that hasn't changed from the original one (almost all of the front piece). And these unchanged parts are still in scale with the old one in the first picture. So it's almost certainly the same size.seems larger it does
The Disruptor was about the same size as a Stalker, and slightly larger than a Zealot. It was never a small unit, but it wasn't a particularly large one either.
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." - C. S. Lewis
"You simply cannot design a mechanic today to mimic the behaviour of a 10-year old mechanic that you removed because nearly nobody would like them today." - Norfindel, on the Macro Mechanics
"We want to focus the player on making interesting choices and not just a bunch of different klicks." - Dustin Browder
StarCraft 2 Beta Blog
02-04-2010, 04:40 PM
#27
The thing is, the old model kind of reminded me of the old reaver, with its segmented body. I really think this thing looks too clumsy...I hope they make the unit a little bit larger... Like mmmmm, the size of the old reaver...
Back with all gun's blazing.
02-04-2010, 04:55 PM
#28
02-04-2010, 04:57 PM
#29
02-04-2010, 05:10 PM
#30