Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 98

Thread: Nullifier renamed + new model?

  1. #51
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,102

    Default Re: Nullifier renamed + new model?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicol Bolas View Post
    What sells the model for me is the ball it's carrying. This is where it gets its wonderful toys from. If they add details to make the sphere change based on its current energy, that would only increase the awesomeness.
    The ball looks too far back for my liking, I figure it's look better tucked in just behind the 'head'. And yeah, a visual 'power level indicator' would rock.

  2. #52

    Default Re: Nullifier renamed + new model?

    I sorta feel like Zerg should get some sorta null void ability, being up against so many caster types and having so many massed/weak units vulnerable to spells and abilities.

  3. #53

    Default Re: Nullifier renamed + new model?

    Quote Originally Posted by MattII View Post
    The ball looks too far back for my liking, I figure it's look better tucked in just behind the 'head'. And yeah, a visual 'power level indicator' would rock.
    Twitter update: Protoss Sentry is now called the SCOUTER




    __________________________________________________ ________

    I think it should use those claws for attacking (maybe throw them like a lightsaber or something cool) instead of that ugly purple laser it has now.

  4. #54

    Default Re: Nullifier renamed + new model?

    Quote Originally Posted by MattII View Post
    And yeah, a visual 'power level indicator' would rock.
    I agree. Maybe it could fill up with a blue liquid kind of like the mana orb in Diablo, or something to that affect.

  5. #55

    Default Re: Nullifier renamed + new model?

    Corsair looks stupid
    Hmmm.....while the 'in game' Corsair model was a little ambiguous, I always liked the model's design (attached) Very unique, very alien - Unlike the Scout, which IMO with a little red, black and silver could have easily ended up a Terran unit.
    "Wait.....no Gzhee-Gzhee.....?.....whu......Why no Ghzhee-Gzhee?!?!?!?!"


    RIP - Leslie Nielsen

  6. #56

    Default Re: Nullifier renamed + new model?

    Eh... I liked the old segmented model better. The whole argument about it "looking like a Zerg unit" seems a bit silly and contrived, because it clearly looked like a high tech machine designed to resemble a living creature which is cool and which is one of the characteristic motiffs of Protoss design (the Reaver and the Phoenix being the best examples). It was sleek and graceful (another important characteristic of Protoss units), the new model feels incongruously bulky in comparison (it really isn't, but it does feel that way; more round, less aggressive, and it is a war machine we're talking about). And moreover, it was a unique and memorable design. The new model feels like one abstract design too many.

  7. #57

    Default Re: Nullifier renamed + new model?

    I liked the old model more. What's that glowing ball over the unit?

    Sentry is a good name.

  8. #58

    Default Re: Nullifier renamed + new model?

    This thing looks like it’d be kinda clumsy when moving on the battle field because its just so.... round... I do really prefure the old design.


    Back with all gun's blazing.

  9. #59

    Default Re: Nullifier renamed + new model?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zabimaru View Post
    This thing looks like it’d be kinda clumsy when moving on the battle field because its just so.... round... I do really prefure the old design.
    It almost seems like something that would stay in the base...

  10. #60

    Default Re: Nullifier renamed + new model?

    Quote Originally Posted by Eligor View Post
    Eh... I liked the old segmented model better. The whole argument about it "looking like a Zerg unit" seems a bit silly and contrived, because it clearly looked like a high tech machine designed to resemble a living creature which is cool and which is one of the characteristic motiffs of Protoss design (the Reaver and the Phoenix being the best examples). It was sleek and graceful (another important characteristic of Protoss units), the new model feels incongruously bulky in comparison (it really isn't, but it does feel that way; more round, less aggressive, and it is a war machine we're talking about). And moreover, it was a unique and memorable design. The new model feels like one abstract design too many.
    I don't know, the whole Trillobite thing does seem a little more befitting to Zerg.

    What's best about the new Sentry design is the 'roundness' of the model. It should make it easier to spot and interact with.

    We endorse the LAN in Starcraft 2 Please. Petition to Blizzard Entertainment.
    http://www.petitiononline.com/LANSC2/petition.html

    LANHAMMER: 252,778
    252,778 against the removal of LAN in StarCraft 2!
    IGN's Article Regarding The Petition Reaching 55,000, "...eliminating LAN play reduces choice"

Similar Threads

  1. 3D model Marine
    By cOntrol in forum Off-Topic Lounge
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 03-24-2010, 01:41 AM
  2. Broodlord Model
    By XSOLDIER in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 11-30-2009, 09:30 PM
  3. High Templar Model
    By Kalash in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 87
    Last Post: 11-07-2009, 01:47 PM
  4. A Model for Zerg Genetic Engineering
    By ArcherofAiur in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-18-2009, 09:49 PM
  5. A Strategic Macro Model
    By ArcherofAiur in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-10-2009, 09:12 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •