3 little questions

[The_Blade]

Checkmate pall... the arguments were presented.

[ManjiSanji]

Archer, everything you're saying makes absolute sense, and I agree with you.

However, the, "Blizzard decided X," does sort of trump things, since it's their game, no matter how odd or flat out ridiculous the decision is.

So...wasn't the whole point of switching the Brood Lord morph to the Corruptor to allow easier transition, or encourage you to have more Corruptors?

I know this might be crazy, but SC2 should be about change sooo...
What if the Mutalisk and Corruptors switched functions?
I know people looooooove their Mutalisks, but change is good, and I feel like Mutalisks strongly represent an issue in SC2; too many things staying the same from SC1 for nostalgia's sake.

[n00bonicPlague]

Yeah, this thread is going everywhere it shouldn't.

Every time I get to the end I forget what we're talking about.



EDIT: I'm clueless on 1 and 3, but for 2, I kinda like the new model.
I just wish it moved more like a manta ray and less like a rollercoaster.

[ArcherofAiur]

Archer, everything you're saying makes absolute sense, and I agree with you.

However, the, "Blizzard decided X," does sort of trump things, since it's their game, no matter how odd or flat out ridiculous the decision is.

Yah thats kinda my point. It looks like a mutalisk, it feels like a mutalisk, it tastes like a mutalisk, but if Blizzard calls it a corruptor people will buy it. Anyway I now present a new skit!

The Emporers New Model Clothing
Blizzard: "We are eh proud to show off the new lurker model!"

Child: "Hey but sir that kinda looks like the baneling model. Actually its the exact same baneling model."

Blizzard: "Eh no their is no baneling in the game anymore. This child is clearly hallucinating."

Child: "But but but its the baneling model, made to look like an evolved zergling. You guys just switched it around without changing anything."

Blizzard: "LOL oh kids and thier crazy imaginations."

Man in the crowd: "Hey hes right....

[Bobo]

I give my thanks to all who had tried to answer my question.
Nicol and Archer focused on one topic, that's ok. But i feel kinda sorry, because they didn't even try to answer my 1# and 3# question.
I also wish to discuss about this http://sclegacy.com/forums/showpost....8&postcount=43 ...but it seems no one is interested in this "problem".