Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42

Thread: Random Blue about D8 Charges (01/29/10)

  1. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,335

    Default Re: Random Blue about D8 Charges (01/29/10)

    I've always felt that D8 charges were extremely nasty, but even more so now.

    On the other hand, I'm not sure many of us here have the speed to kill even a single D8 charge in 2 seconds, even if they are killable :P.

  2. #12

    Default Re: Random Blue about D8 Charges (01/29/10)

    Quote Originally Posted by rcp181 View Post
    They're not static defense because they explode about 2-3 seconds after you put them down.
    Think he means (if they can get close enough) they can now easily be used on static defenses (bunkers, turrets) without any real counter or risk.
    "Wait.....no Gzhee-Gzhee.....?.....whu......Why no Ghzhee-Gzhee?!?!?!?!"


    RIP - Leslie Nielsen

  3. #13

    Default Re: Random Blue about D8 Charges (01/29/10)

    Personally, not all that surprised. I reckon it's because having them destroyable made their effectiveness too unpredictable and so hard to balance. On the one end, you might have a situation where only very few charges will survive long enough to detonate and so each individual D8 Charge needs to be fairly potent in the amount of damage dealt. On the other, if the opponent misses the opportunity and all charges make it to the end, you wind up doing disproportionately terrible, terrible damage. By making invincible, their behavior becomes a little more predictable. I also expect their damage to be nerfed, whether it be size radius or damage inflicted.

    Of course, there are other possible explanations. Maybe it could be something technical. Perhaps the charges weren't stacking properly with those detonating (a millisecond) earlier were destroying other D8 Charges around it (assuming friendly fire is on)? Or, maybe in-house testing showed that the killability of the D8 Charges hardly ever mattered and the charges often went unharmed.

  4. #14

    Default Re: Random Blue about D8 Charges (01/29/10)

    at least give the static defenses a chance to survive
    Why? Reapers are a direct counter to static defenses. That's what Reaper charges are for.

    It's like saying that Immortal Hardened Shields should only reduce damage to 20, to give Siege Tanks a chance.

    On the other hand, I'm not sure many of us here have the speed to kill even a single D8 charge in 2 seconds, even if they are killable
    If there are a lot of Marines around, simply tell them to attack-move. The Marines will pick various different charges to shoot at, taking them all out well before the timer goes off. The charges didn't have many Hp, so they'd go down pretty quick.
    "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." - C. S. Lewis

    "You simply cannot design a mechanic today to mimic the behaviour of a 10-year old mechanic that you removed because nearly nobody would like them today." - Norfindel, on the Macro Mechanics

    "We want to focus the player on making interesting choices and not just a bunch of different klicks." - Dustin Browder

    StarCraft 2 Beta Blog

  5. #15

    Default Re: Random Blue about D8 Charges (01/29/10)

    Quote Originally Posted by Caliban113 View Post
    Think he means (if they can get close enough) they can now easily be used on static defenses (bunkers, turrets) without any real counter or risk.
    Ah ok, thanks for clearing that up. Now that I think about it they sound like free banelings when it comes to taking out defenses.

  6. #16

    Default Re: Random Blue about D8 Charges (01/29/10)

    Are d8's limited like vulture mines? If not, it should be nerfed to say, a certain amount that it will take at least 5 charges to take down a supply depot. Recharge rate should be to 120% of the time it takes to build a depot.

  7. #17
    zenner's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3

    Default Re: Random Blue about D8 Charges (01/29/10)

    now only need to make them so they stick on units

  8. #18

    Default Re: Random Blue about D8 Charges (01/29/10)

    Quote Originally Posted by zenner View Post
    now only need to make them so they stick on units
    That will make d8's like that of the Zerg's kaboom thing.

  9. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,335

    Default Re: Random Blue about D8 Charges (01/29/10)

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicol Bolas View Post


    If there are a lot of Marines around, simply tell them to attack-move. The Marines will pick various different charges to shoot at, taking them all out well before the timer goes off. The charges didn't have many Hp, so they'd go down pretty quick.
    Oh, I was thinking more in the context of using D8 charges in a pitched battle (unless you're so on top with your surveillance that you can produce a lot of marines at every location where Reapers try to raid you). I don't think that Marines will prioritise D8 charges over attacking enemy ranged units if you ask them to attack-move.

    If that's the case, then all that most of us would be able to do is to just do an old-fashioned 'run away', in which case the killability of D8 charges doesn't really matter a whole lot.

  10. #20

    Default Re: Random Blue about D8 Charges (01/29/10)

    If not, it should be nerfed to say, a certain amount that it will take at least 5 charges to take down a supply depot. Recharge rate should be to 120% of the time it takes to build a depot.
    Why? Depots will likely be placed in front of bunkers in a hard-contain situation, to keep melee units away from Bunkers. Having Reapers who can blow them up quickly and cheaply is a substantial help.

    If your concern is for Reapers doing a raid on your base, there are things you can do to stop them. Like killing them.

    Zerg players have to suffer with Overlord harassment from any air unit. No reason that Terran players shouldn't be able to harass the supply of other races.

    Oh, I was thinking more in the context of using D8 charges in a pitched battle (unless you're so on top with your surveillance that you can produce a lot of marines at every location where Reapers try to raid you).
    I was talking about Reapers in the pitched battle. Which would also involve the Marines in question.

    I don't think that Marines will prioritise D8 charges over attacking enemy ranged units if you ask them to attack-move.
    The Marines behind the front-line Marines will target them. You know, the ones that are out of range of the real targets.
    "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." - C. S. Lewis

    "You simply cannot design a mechanic today to mimic the behaviour of a 10-year old mechanic that you removed because nearly nobody would like them today." - Norfindel, on the Macro Mechanics

    "We want to focus the player on making interesting choices and not just a bunch of different klicks." - Dustin Browder

    StarCraft 2 Beta Blog

Similar Threads

  1. Random Blues FTW (11/30/09)
    By n00bonicPlague in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-30-2009, 02:16 PM
  2. SC2: Random Thread
    By trace wm in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 86
    Last Post: 10-29-2009, 07:41 PM
  3. Random Poll #1
    By LordofAscension in forum Off-Topic Lounge
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-28-2009, 12:09 AM
  4. A few Blue posts from today about random details
    By n00bonicPlague in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 07-04-2009, 06:10 PM
  5. Random TL picture from the conference
    By n00bonicPlague in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-23-2009, 06:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •