View Poll Results: Do you like the Old Carrier or the New Carrier model more?

Voters
85. You may not vote on this poll
  • Old Carrier

    52 61.18%
  • New Carrier

    33 38.82%
Page 22 of 23 FirstFirst ... 1220212223 LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 228

Thread: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

  1. #211

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post
    The reason many scientists think that any advanced aliens we encounter will be humanoid in form is because of certain things we've determined are vital to intelligent technological advancement. The ability to survive through either strong or physically high mounted senses for safety, room for increasing brain capacity, limbs that allow the ability to grasp/hold/manipulate the environment efficiently, etc. The chances of any intelligent land based species having a head, a torso, and at least one pair of arms and legs each is EXTREMELY high. Its not a complex form, like an insect, and it functions well. So believing that space-faring or at least sapient extraterrestrials we may encounter will have the same basic body form as us is not crazy. Even the Elcor have two arms, two legs, and a distinct head.
    What? No. You are wrong. Begining with saying that the human body is not a complex form.

    Seriously can people who dont understand how a human body is formed please stop posting as if they do? Go research and then explain as best you can how the four major body cavities are formed and then well talk.
    Last edited by ArcherofAiur; 02-02-2010 at 12:54 PM.

  2. #212

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Yeah guys, listen to the the human anatomy expert who thinks humanoids are ridiculous.

  3. #213

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    What about the ones called "people of the light"? Those are beings that are inorganic, but can materialize as well. I know there's no proof of this but ancient writings.

    Do you guys think it is possible that these type of beings can exist? I think they're massless life-forms
    http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmi...l#masslesslife, like our minds (as thought of).

    Quote Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post
    The reason many scientists think that any advanced aliens we encounter will be humanoid in form is because of certain things we've determined are vital to intelligent technological advancement. The ability to survive through either strong or physically high mounted senses for safety, room for increasing brain capacity, limbs that allow the ability to grasp/hold/manipulate the environment efficiently, etc. The chances of any intelligent land based species having a head, a torso, and at least one pair of arms and legs each is EXTREMELY high. Its not a complex form, like an insect, and it functions well. So believing that space-faring or at least sapient extraterrestrials we may encounter will have the same basic body form as us is not crazy. Even the Elcor have two arms, two legs, and a distinct head.
    Is it possible for intelligence to evolve naturally out of a non-competitive environment? Does these kinds of eco-systems exist, or does everything in the universe have to go through the same kind of system we have? Is it possible that a world exists where predators does not exist?

    I sound stupid and uninformed, because I honestly don't know a thing about this stuff, but I'm eager to learn more.
    Last edited by GnaReffotsirk; 02-02-2010 at 01:55 PM.

  4. #214

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Being highly improbable doesn't mean it can't happen.
    Proving a negative isn't possible without an exhaustive search. Yes, it's possible. It's also possible for the Earth to spontaneously fly into the sun. That doesn't mean we should all jump on space ships, and it doesn't mean that all Sci-Fi should be based on the Earth flying into the sun.

    Ants don't have independent thought, only basic instinct
    Don't be too sure about that. Some ant species have been known to learn things from other ants. And ants that fail to learn things are relegated to different tasks.

    Due to wieght and load bearing factors you would never see giant arthropods (at least not crab or spider looking ones).
    I put "giant" in quotes for a reason. Giant in this case meaning "larger than current arthropods." You'd get things like dog-sized spiders and such. Not elephant-sized.

    Large enough to carry a decent-sized brain.

    Actually their are 5 almost entirely seperate lines of evolutionary descent. Their called kingdoms. Do they still teach biology in school?
    *sigh* "That's two almost entirely separate lines of evolutionary descent" that lead to multicellular animals. Context is key.

    If it is almost impossible that humanoid civilized life appears, it wouldn't be much more likely than that civilized life with other body shapes appears.
    The point is that evolution doesn't work that way.

    It just so happened that the line of descent, tetrapod animals, was able to be turned into a bipedal animal with a head on top. If the dominant land animal had instead been something not a tetrapod, we wouldn't look anything like we do today.

    The reason many scientists think that any advanced aliens we encounter will be humanoid in form
    Um, what scientists are these? I've never heard of them.

    Its not a complex form, like an insect, and it functions well. So believing that space-faring or at least sapient extraterrestrials we may encounter will have the same basic body form as us is not crazy.
    Insects do not have the same basic body form as us.
    "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." - C. S. Lewis

    "You simply cannot design a mechanic today to mimic the behaviour of a 10-year old mechanic that you removed because nearly nobody would like them today." - Norfindel, on the Macro Mechanics

    "We want to focus the player on making interesting choices and not just a bunch of different klicks." - Dustin Browder

    StarCraft 2 Beta Blog

  5. #215

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by Triceron View Post
    Yeah guys, listen to the the human anatomy expert who thinks humanoids are ridiculous.
    Its not that humans are ridiculous. Its that you have to realize form follows function not the other way around.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicol Bolas View Post
    Proving a negative isn't possible without an exhaustive search. Yes, it's possible. It's also possible for the Earth to spontaneously fly into the sun. That doesn't mean we should all jump on space ships, and it doesn't mean that all Sci-Fi should be based on the Earth flying into the sun.
    Oh so thats how you deflect the "PROVE IT" arguement. *runs off to post this in the broodlord thread*



    Other than that I think Nicol and I are mostly on the same side.
    Last edited by ArcherofAiur; 02-02-2010 at 01:54 PM.

  6. #216

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Nicol's debasing 'facts' about alien humanoids, of which there are none. We have no living proof that sapient intelligence is linked to being humanoid, it's simply a common theme in Science Fiction.

    You don't approve of humanoid aliens in fiction. Your reasons go beyond fact, since you simply don't agree with sapient humanoid intelligence other than from Humans. You're not accepting all forms of alien intelligence since you're discounting the possibility of humanoid ones existing.

  7. #217

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by Triceron View Post
    We have no living proof that sapient intelligence is linked to being humanoid, it's simply a common theme in Science Fiction.
    Im learning more and more about forum proof everyday. Hey quick aside, do you know what the next most intelligent animal after us and chimpanzees is?


  8. #218

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur View Post
    Im learning more and more about forum proof everyday. Hey quick aside, do you know what the next most intelligent animal after us and chimpanzees is?

    Those are the ancestors of mermaids. After some 6000 years of evolution, mermaids came as they are.

    Who said half-humanoid isn't good enough?

    Seriously, sci-fi extra-terrestrials are just a modern form of cyclops, minotaur, dwarfs, elves, orcs, orgres, and last but not the least:

    Humpty Dumpty.

    It's an egg, but the artist needed to put some arms, feet, and clothing. Humpty Dumpty explains everything.

  9. #219

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Dolphins are interesting since they show that a race can be highly intelligent but yet have no chance at all to create a civilization. Perhaps there are aliens that are more intelligent than humans yet lack the appendages to use tools and therefore can't become civilized.

  10. #220

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Your reasons go beyond fact, since you simply don't agree with sapient humanoid intelligence other than from Humans. You're not accepting all forms of alien intelligence since you're discounting the possibility of humanoid ones existing.
    What I'm saying is that the likelihood of such a thing is infinitesimally small. I discount the possibility of infinitesimally small possibilities happening.
    "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." - C. S. Lewis

    "You simply cannot design a mechanic today to mimic the behaviour of a 10-year old mechanic that you removed because nearly nobody would like them today." - Norfindel, on the Macro Mechanics

    "We want to focus the player on making interesting choices and not just a bunch of different klicks." - Dustin Browder

    StarCraft 2 Beta Blog

Similar Threads

  1. Carrier death => suicidal Interceptors
    By n00bonicPlague in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 11-18-2009, 01:18 PM
  2. Scrapped Editorial Material & Another Carrier Fix
    By DemolitionSquid in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 11-11-2009, 03:01 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •