View Poll Results: Do you like the Old Carrier or the New Carrier model more?

Voters
85. You may not vote on this poll
  • Old Carrier

    52 61.18%
  • New Carrier

    33 38.82%
Page 19 of 23 FirstFirst ... 91718192021 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 190 of 228

Thread: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

  1. #181

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by MattII View Post
    Windows on a starship are counter-intuitive, they weaken the structure, let in radiation, and there's rarely anything good to look at. Besides, windows on a Protoss ship look out of place.
    Indeed. My biggest gripe with Sci-Fi is a ridiculous need for writers to put windows on their starships. Its why I loved the design of the Covenant vessels in Halo: no vulnerable windows, and the bridge protected in the center of the ship. Much, much better design.

  2. #182

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by MattII View Post
    Windows on a starship are counter-intuitive, they weaken the structure, let in radiation, and there's rarely anything good to look at. Besides, windows on a Protoss ship look out of place.
    http://www.mobygames.com/game/window...eShotId,13684/

    meh

    ps - I agree that practically speaking, windows are a very bad idea on spaceships, but imo they do add a cinematic aspect. even protoss ships in the manga are often depicted with large windows. besides, supposedly the protoss rely on shields for protection from radiation and attack, so windows would only add to the delicate-looking design many of their ships possess.
    Last edited by imdrunkontea; 02-01-2010 at 10:04 PM.

  3. #183

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post
    Indeed. My biggest gripe with Sci-Fi is a ridiculous need for writers to put windows on their starships.
    Really,thats your biggest gripe?




    Mine is that all aliens are just humans with different funny noses. Shame on you Mass Effect. Shivans (Freespace) take the cake for actually having some creativity.
    Last edited by ArcherofAiur; 02-01-2010 at 10:15 PM.

  4. #184
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,102

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Windows on Starships are far from the only mistakes regularly made in the genre.

  5. #185

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur View Post
    Mine is that all aliens are just humans with different funny noses. Shame on you Mass Effect.
    Wait, wha?

    Have you even played Mass Effect? There's like... only one other race that actually looks like humans, the Asari. But I guess Elcor do have funny noses, eh?

  6. #186

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by Triceron View Post
    Wait, wha?

    Have you even played Mass Effect? There's like... only one other race that actually looks like humans, the Asari. But I guess Elcor do have funny noses, eh?
    This is what im talking about. I dont blame you Triceron, your part of a greater population that doesnt realize how ridiculous it is to have every alien be a variation on the human body plan with maybe bird feet thrown in for good effect.




    Out of all of those only the Hanar pass the mustard.

  7. #187

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Well, sure. If that's your definition of funny nose.

  8. #188
    Pandonetho's Avatar SC:L Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,214

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Mine is that all aliens are just humans with different funny noses
    Wait so lurkers are humans with funny noses now?

  9. #189

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by Pandonetho View Post
    Wait so lurkers are humans with funny noses now?
    Zerg do a pretty good job, at least as far as the industry standards go. Protoss not so much (why would you need muscles if your a photoautotroph?).
    Last edited by ArcherofAiur; 02-01-2010 at 10:50 PM.

  10. #190

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Actually, that's contrary to belief.

    It's not that people who create aliens don't know better when coming up with ideas that are truly 'alien' and not humanoid, but rather giving human characteristics allows people to familiarize themselves with something that is freakish or foreign. To our knowledge, humans are the only sapient creatures in the world, in the galaxy, in the universe. When we characterize another sapient race, we expect to see something similar to us humans.

    There may be a billion types of weird looking creatures in these fictional settings. We see other humanoid species the most because we associate humanoids as sapient.

    It's not to say you can't have every race look completely non-humanoid and unique, but it has its own set of problems. If you cast a space opera with a dozen different looking races, and the Humans are the only humanoids, then you run the risk of Humans looking more like Aliens than the Aliens.
    Last edited by Triceron; 02-01-2010 at 11:07 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Carrier death => suicidal Interceptors
    By n00bonicPlague in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 11-18-2009, 01:18 PM
  2. Scrapped Editorial Material & Another Carrier Fix
    By DemolitionSquid in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 11-11-2009, 03:01 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •