View Poll Results: Do you like the Old Carrier or the New Carrier model more?

Voters
85. You may not vote on this poll
  • Old Carrier

    52 61.18%
  • New Carrier

    33 38.82%
Page 18 of 23 FirstFirst ... 81617181920 ... LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 228

Thread: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

  1. #171

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Updated for realism

  2. #172

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by Triceron View Post
    Updated for realism
    LOL wow that's great.

  3. #173
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,102

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur View Post
    Can we brainstorm ways to improve the carrier model with these points in mind (while still keeping the spirit of the old carrier)?
    That hole in the upper hull is too gaping, make it just a regular line (like it is as the bow). The 'bridge' looks like it's attached to the hull by just the loops, give it a more solid attachment.

    GnaReffotsirk's new design is good, the Carrier looks sleek, but without being glitzy.

  4. #174

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    I did a crude photoshop and added windows; I think it helps to add some feeling of mass to the carrier/make it feel like an actual capital ship.


  5. #175

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Can you add space curtains too? For when they are flying near suns and stuff.

  6. #176

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    I think it looks great. While I always hope Blizzard could do better, I'd be content with that shipping.

    Ah, minus the windows. Nice effort, but a minor detail that honestly won't really be noticed.

  7. #177

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    hmm, well I personally thought it would help give it a sense of scale. windows on sci-fi capital ships are pretty common, as can be seen in star wars, star trek, and even the battlecruiser.

  8. #178

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by imdrunkontea View Post
    hmm, well I personally thought it would help give it a sense of scale. windows on sci-fi capital ships are pretty common, as can be seen in star wars, star trek, and even the battlecruiser.
    True, but they don't put windows on the battlecruiser model in-game.

  9. #179
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,102

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Windows on a starship are counter-intuitive, they weaken the structure, let in radiation, and there's rarely anything good to look at. Besides, windows on a Protoss ship look out of place.

  10. #180

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by Archer View Post
    lol post that on bnet. People will flip out rejoicing that Blizz finally fixed the carrier
    Heh, do it. I don't have a BNet account, but I'd love to see the reaction. :P
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt
    Besides, windows on a Protoss ship look out of place.
    Tell that to the SC1 cinematics department.
    Aaand sold.


    Be it through hallowed grounds or lands of sorrow
    The Forger's wake is bereft and fallow

    Is the residuum worth the cost of destruction and maiming;
    Or is the shaping a culling and exercise in taming?

    The road's goal is the Origin of Being
    But be wary through what thickets it winds.

Similar Threads

  1. Carrier death => suicidal Interceptors
    By n00bonicPlague in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 11-18-2009, 01:18 PM
  2. Scrapped Editorial Material & Another Carrier Fix
    By DemolitionSquid in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 11-11-2009, 03:01 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •