View Poll Results: Do you like the Old Carrier or the New Carrier model more?

Voters
85. You may not vote on this poll
  • Old Carrier

    52 61.18%
  • New Carrier

    33 38.82%
Page 2 of 23 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 228

Thread: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

  1. #11

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post

    It should have been a Zerg unit

    The new Brood Lord is kind of a Zerg version of the carrier.

    It would have been cool having a Zerg carrier though. Maybe a Behemoth or Leviathan that spits out little Scourges.

    As for the original question, I agree with electricmole... I like the new graphic, but it should be fatter considering its got a bunch of little ships inside it.

  2. #12

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Wow pro new-carrier people. Im surprised. Where were you guys before?

  3. #13

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    I want this...

    http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/st...SC2_Cncpt1.jpg

    kick sc2 "tempestcarrier"

  4. #14

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    I agree, new one is better except that it looks too fragile. They need to update it with more bulk.

  5. #15

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by scorpio19 View Post
    I want this...
    Thats basically the new carrier minus some details. They even show the new model in the picture.

  6. #16

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Old Carrier +1

    We endorse the LAN in Starcraft 2 Please. Petition to Blizzard Entertainment.
    http://www.petitiononline.com/LANSC2/petition.html

    LANHAMMER: 252,778
    252,778 against the removal of LAN in StarCraft 2!
    IGN's Article Regarding The Petition Reaching 55,000, "...eliminating LAN play reduces choice"

  7. #17
    Gradius's Avatar SC:L Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    9,988

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    The new carrier is basically a reskinned version of a different unit that meant to serve a different role. It's an ad-hoc reskin, and it shows. I don't see how anyone can possibly justify the new carrier...especially when the excuse for bringing it back was iconic status. It makes no sense.

    Old carrier wins IMO. It's just too bad there isn't a third "better Carrier than both of these" option.

    Quote Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur View Post
    Thats basically the new carrier minus some details. They even show the new model in the picture.
    There are a bunch of differences which I've pointed out repeatedly in other threads. In fact, the only real similarities are that it's golden and has hoops; practically everything else is different.

    And that's not the new model in the background; it's the tempest.

  8. #18

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur View Post
    Thats basically the new carrier minus some details. They even show the new model in the picture.
    i would like the new carrier in game model, if it looked like that. but it doesn't. the old carrier looked better than the tempest carrier wannabe

  9. #19
    The_Blade's Avatar Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,249

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Old carrier for me. Although I might need to see the new carrier with its polished armor (take the current mothership as an example).

  10. #20

    Default Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier

    Quote Originally Posted by Gradius View Post
    The new carrier is basically a reskinned version of a different unit that meant to serve a different role. It's an ad-hoc reskin, and it shows. I don't see how anyone can possibly justify the new carrier...especially when the excuse for bringing it back was iconic status. It makes no sense.

    On that subject Id like to once again complain about the muta I mean corruptor evolution. A good model but its all too obviously they made it to be a mutalisk evolution and didnt change anything when moving it over to the corruptor.




    Quote Originally Posted by Gradius View Post


    There are a bunch of differences which I've pointed out repeatedly in other threads. In fact, the only real similarities are that it's golden and has hoops; practically everything else is different.

    And that's not the new model in the background; it's the tempest.
    Yah I think thats more of a semantics arguement than anythings else. I think of it as Banana model and goatskull model (whatever the minor details and color changes).
    Last edited by ArcherofAiur; 01-24-2010 at 08:10 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Carrier death => suicidal Interceptors
    By n00bonicPlague in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 11-18-2009, 01:18 PM
  2. Scrapped Editorial Material & Another Carrier Fix
    By DemolitionSquid in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 11-11-2009, 03:01 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •