The Gifts of StarCraft 2

[GGTeMpLaR]

LOL. I'm sorry Gifted has given us better reason to trust him than you and your "source".

Don't turn this thread into a grammar war.

It's not a matter of who has a better reason to be trusted. It's a matter of consistent judgment.

I'm not turning this into a grammar war, I was simply correcting your bad grammar so in the future you won't likely make the same mistake (it's silly to type with proper grammar, punctuation, capitalization, etc. if you're going to make a mistake anyways and then be upset when someone corrects you).

[EndlessSky]

Word of mouth is the worst kind of evidence. In my opinion it doesn't matter what position you hold, I need more than words to believe 100%.

If your gonna believe stuff which has no real evidence to back it up, and it turns out to be wrong don't get mad because it's your fault for believing it in the first place.

[AdmiralMengsk]

It's not a matter of who has a better reason to be trusted. It's a matter of consistent judgment.

I'm not turning this into a grammar war, I was simply correcting your bad grammar so in the future you won't likely make the same mistake (it's silly to type with proper grammar, punctuation, capitalization, etc. if you're going to make a mistake anyways and then be upset when someone corrects you).

Upset? I simply posted that you shouldn't attempt to turn this into an argument about grammar. You want to attack my grammar because the rest of your argument is useless.

[Domi87]

Starcraft Twitter: We have not finalized #StarCraft2 beta system requirements yet, but will do so when beta starts. #SCUpdate

[Sydarm]

The best part of that twitter is them saying beta as if it exists

LOL

[GGTeMpLaR]

Perhaps if your being misread in so many ways, maybe you should stick with posts containing more then two words. In any case GGtemplar you need to keep your opinions on whats "fail." to your self. Considering how you embarrassed your self by providing false information, and a false "source. You should be careful what you say. Its hard to think anything a troll or liar in your case says is truthful.

I will express my opinions to those who express their opinions to me and in the same respect, and my posts exceed more than two words easily (which doesn't exactly mean you read more than two words of my post). You are right though, I did embarrass myself yesterday, although I'm still not convinced with certainty that my source/their information is false (and I never said so either, and I find it suspicious that my threads were immediately deleted on the battle.net forums). I'm neither a troll or a liar though so it's a good thing none of that applies to me. I'll try to be careful with what I say though, yesterday I slipped up coming forward too soon.

[GGTeMpLaR]

Upset? I simply posted that you shouldn't attempt to turn this into an argument about grammar. You want to attack my grammar because the rest of your argument is useless.

As a matter of fact, I refused your argument (which is actually the one that was useless), then corrected your grammar.

I wasn't turning it into a grammar argument by merely correcting you. You trying to tell me I shouldn't correct bad grammar when good grammar is used in the rest of your post is in fact inciting a grammar argument (the only reason you could do so I believe is because you are upset).

You should have just taken it for what it was, a one-war correction that needs no further discussion.

[Edfishy]

Hah, as long as real specs come up at some point, I think all is golden. Hopefully, the Beta doesn't require 15 gigs!

PS; Thanks for clarifying, Gifted, and thanks to JD (and Blizzard staff) for trying to resolve the problem.

[Sydarm]

honestly gifted, take a SS or that convo can easily be faked

[GGTeMpLaR]

So, Jack Doe found me. This is an excerp from our most recent small conversation. He said that if it helps to understand, copy/paste it directly (I even kept that part in). This is slightly edited because his typing is not fully smooth (I added basic punctuations) and also removed some specific names with replacements (such as PR).

It was a misunderstanding and I jumped the gun. When I posted the gift of "controlled" I believed it as much as you guys. I was told essentially a controlled leak was going up. If the information that went up was completely legit and was removed promptly, the conversation would have gone the opposite direction. I can see exactly what their intent was. Doesn't change how it looks to you all.

I remember how people freaked out last time when I stated what I heard as a misunderstanding (the Friends and Family Alpha) situation before I found out the full situation. While a part of me is sorry for causing confusion, (something that's quite all over the community right now) another part of me is not sorry for attempting to share the information I can as I get it.

So does this means the correct specs are actually going to be uploaded sometime today?

*Twitter post: Starcraft Twitter: We have not finalized #StarCraft2 beta system requirements yet, but will do so when beta starts. #SCUpdate *

If they actually upload the specs today, is that a hint? xD