Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 81

Thread: Are the Zerg really Evolved?

  1. #41

    Default Re: Are the Zerg really Evolved?

    You can make corruptors evolve from mutas, roaches from lings and such, but what's the justification? Isn't it going backwards to say that it's been 4 years since and the Zerg have fewer NEW strains than evolutionary ones?

  2. #42
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    18

    Default Re: Are the Zerg really Evolved?

    Quote Originally Posted by Triceron View Post
    You can make corruptors evolve from mutas, roaches from lings and such, but what's the justification? Isn't it going backwards to say that it's been 4 years since and the Zerg have fewer NEW strains than evolutionary ones?
    I'm still of the idea mutalisks and hydralisk should both be scrapped for new units. It's not like the other 2 races are getting any better then this treatment.

  3. #43

    Default Re: Are the Zerg really Evolved?

    I would very much like to see more evolutionary strains. Treat the Zerg like Pokemon.

    Oh I know! New macro mechanic - use elemental stones to evolve your Zergling into either Vaporling, Joltling, or Flareling!

  4. #44
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    18

    Default Re: Are the Zerg really Evolved?

    Quote Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post
    I would very much like to see more evolutionary strains. Treat the Zerg like Pokemon.

    Oh I know! New macro mechanic - use elemental stones to evolve your Zergling into either Vaporling, Joltling, or Flareling!
    I know you are being tongue in cheek with this but tbh its not far off what should be happening. The zerg SHOULD be doing something similar to this.

    The Brutalisk is a nice example of an evolved Ultralisk.

    Idk a hydralisk could evolve into a terralisk haha. Increase its armor and AA ability reducing ground ability.

    Anyway, just playing aorund but i guess thars just an idea.

  5. #45

    Default Re: Are the Zerg really Evolved?

    Quote Originally Posted by tyrel68 View Post
    Idk a hydralisk could evolve into a terralisk haha. Increase its armor and AA ability reducing ground ability..
    An AA Hydralisk evolution would be called a Basilisk.

  6. #46

    Default Re: Are the Zerg really Evolved?

    Quote Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post
    I would very much like to see more evolutionary strains. Treat the Zerg like Pokemon.

    Oh I know! New macro mechanic - use elemental stones to evolve your Zergling into either Vaporling, Joltling, or Flareling!
    This gives me an idea... What if instead of having Ground/Air Weapons/Armour upgrades like the other two races, every Zerg unit will have its own specific upgrade options that will allow you to choose between different paths of specification for the unit? So for example you'll have to choose between Faster Zerglings with Greater Attack Rate, Slower Zerglings with Higher Damage and HP and Cliff Jumping Zerglings with Faster Movement but Lower HP (that's just an example, I know cliff jumping Zerglings are a questionable idea), once a specification upgrade is chosen there is no going back; however, then you'll be able to choose between Hydralisks that Deal More Damage to Air, Hydralisks that Deal More Damage to Ground and Hydralisks withe Shorter Range but More Armour and Insane Regeneration While Burrowed and so on for each and every unit. Of course a great deal of thought would have to be given to each and every specification path and the various synergies between units that could thus be created.
    Since Zerg are more macro oriented, this requires the player to spend more attention to the allocation of his resources and gives him more choices in customizing his army and adapting his strategy to the enemy (and it is a way to make the old units (that so many complain about being bland and holding the Zerg back from innovation) interesting again, give them new life).
    Last but not least, it seems an appropriate mechanic for a race that boasts such volatile genetic mutability as well as representing (among other things) the force of biological evolution unleashed.

  7. #47
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    18

    Default Re: Are the Zerg really Evolved?

    Quote Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post
    An AA Hydralisk evolution would be called a Basilisk.
    heh i just pulled that out of thin air cause i thought it sounded cool heh.

    Agreed yours is more apt

  8. #48

    Default Re: Are the Zerg really Evolved?

    Pikalisk, I choose you!

  9. #49

    Default Re: Are the Zerg really Evolved?

    Quote Originally Posted by Triceron View Post
    Pikalisk, I choose you!
    A truly nightmare inducing hybrid.

  10. #50

    Default Re: Are the Zerg really Evolved?

    Quote Originally Posted by Eligor View Post
    This gives me an idea... What if instead of having Ground/Air Weapons/Armour upgrades like the other two races, every Zerg unit will have its own specific upgrade options that will allow you to choose between different paths of specification for the unit? So for example you'll have to choose between Faster Zerglings with Greater Attack Rate, Slower Zerglings with Higher Damage and HP and Cliff Jumping Zerglings with Faster Movement but Lower HP (that's just an example, I know cliff jumping Zerglings are a questionable idea), once a specification upgrade is chosen there is no going back; however, then you'll be able to choose between Hydralisks that Deal More Damage to Air, Hydralisks that Deal More Damage to Ground and Hydralisks withe Shorter Range but More Armour and Insane Regeneration While Burrowed and so on for each and every unit. Of course a great deal of thought would have to be given to each and every specification path and the various synergies between units that could thus be created.
    Since Zerg are more macro oriented, this requires the player to spend more attention to the allocation of his resources and gives him more choices in customizing his army and adapting his strategy to the enemy (and it is a way to make the old units (that so many complain about being bland and holding the Zerg back from innovation) interesting again, give them new life).
    Last but not least, it seems an appropriate mechanic for a race that boasts such volatile genetic mutability as well as representing (among other things) the force of biological evolution unleashed.
    I am totally for this! But, each unit should have visual cues as to what evolution choices have been made as the more drastic changes should be detectable.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •