The Zerg do not need a cliff climbing unit. They have the Mutalisk and the Nydus Network.
View Poll Results: Should the Lurker stay?
- Voters
- 61. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes
39 63.93% -
No
22 36.07%
Results 41 to 50 of 105
-
12-08-2009, 03:32 PM
#41
SC:L Addict
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 16,324
Re: I think the Lurker should be scrapped...
-
12-08-2009, 04:33 PM
#42
SC:L Addict
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 5,086
Re: I think the Lurker should be scrapped...
Just to be clear your talking about this model right?
Originally Posted by StrongCoffee
-
12-08-2009, 06:01 PM
#43
Member
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 2,882
Re: I think the Lurker should be scrapped...
I don't think we should remove the lurker until we get more solid gameplay examples of it. I'm going to vote yes, but might change my mind after beta comes out.
Please be aware of the SC:L Posting Rules and Guidelines.
If I were you, I'd look at these links. You might even follow or like them or something...
StarCraft: Legacy: Like us on Facebook - Follow us on Twitter - Subscribe to our Youtube channel
Legacy Observer: Watch live on Twitch.tv - Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Subscribe to Youtube Channel
-
12-08-2009, 06:04 PM
#44
Member
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 4,218
Re: I think the Lurker should be scrapped...
I thought that was an older iteration - isn't it? Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur
Just to be clear your talking about this model right?
Hidden Content:Aaand sold.
Be it through hallowed grounds or lands of sorrow
The Forger's wake is bereft and fallow
Is the residuum worth the cost of destruction and maiming;
Or is the shaping a culling and exercise in taming?
The road's goal is the Origin of Being
But be wary through what thickets it winds.
-
12-08-2009, 06:06 PM
#45
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 5,086
Re: I think the Lurker should be scrapped...
I think its still the same model. I just cant believe they would take such an iconic, tarantula look and replace it with beanie baby legs. Especially for a underground digging unit!
-
12-08-2009, 06:07 PM
#46
Member
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 2,446
Re: I think the Lurker should be scrapped...
It's definitely been changed since then.
The skin is COMPLETELY different.
The Mother of all Queens!
Thanks to Dynamik- for the signature!
-
12-08-2009, 06:12 PM
#47
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 5,086
Re: I think the Lurker should be scrapped...
Oh here we go. They changed the head but it still has the bumblebee butt. For the record I think the head looks pretty good now.
Contrast with the Tarantula legs of the original Lurker.
Last edited by ArcherofAiur; 12-08-2009 at 06:19 PM.
-
12-08-2009, 06:41 PM
#48
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 177
Re: I think the Lurker should be scrapped...
Nopes, Im talking of the NEW new model, the one that can see in the death animations video. The new one has a visible horned head, at least the last time I saw. Maybe they´re the same and the angle is messing with me. But I hope I made myself clear Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur
-
12-08-2009, 06:44 PM
#49
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 5,086
Re: I think the Lurker should be scrapped...
Yah I think were agree the horned head looks good. But what do you think about the legs? Do you like the new small ones more than the BW version? Originally Posted by StrongCoffee
-
12-08-2009, 06:48 PM
#50
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 177
Re: I think the Lurker should be scrapped...
I´ll agree with you this time. The current legs arent UGLY, but if you look it from a functional point of view, as a burrower creepy creature, it should have the oldf tarantula legs back. Now....about that fifth leg. Why?? Why a FIFHT leg?
(anyone can tell me what zerg unit is the big one that appears on the right of the SS posted by archer? some kind of brutaliskż)
Reply With Quote
Similar Threads
-
Scrapped Editorial Material & Another Carrier Fix
By DemolitionSquid in forum StarCraft DiscussionReplies: 36Last Post: 11-11-2009, 03:01 AM
