Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 66

Thread: Planetary Fortress discussion

  1. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,102

    Default Re: Planetary Fortress discussion

    Would it help if the PF were to lose its guns, but be allowed to fly, and become a Bunker of sorts (no carrying units while flying though)?

  2. #12

    Default Re: Planetary Fortress discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by MattII View Post
    Would it help if the PF were to lose its guns, but be allowed to fly, and become a Bunker of sorts (no carrying units while flying though)?
    Not in the slightest.

  3. #13

    Default Re: Planetary Fortress discussion

    lol the Command Center can already fly while carrying units (SCVs)

  4. #14
    The_Blade's Avatar Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,249

    Default Re: Planetary Fortress discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by MattII View Post
    Would it help if the PF were to lose its guns, but be allowed to fly, and become a Bunker of sorts (no carrying units while flying though)?
    It would be like letting a siege tank attack from inside the medivac while sieged.

  5. #15

    Default Re: Planetary Fortress discussion

    You can land CCs in their base then convert them to PFs. Then feel good.


  6. #16

    Default Re: Planetary Fortress discussion

    Somehow, I get the feeling that the workers in that base alone could take it out before it's done upgrading. Of course, by taking a single worker and moving it around beneath the CC, you could prevent it from landing in the first place...
    Think of the micro opportunities!

  7. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,102

    Default Re: Planetary Fortress discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Blade View Post
    It would be like letting a siege tank attack from inside the medivac while sieged.
    Except that the PF wouldn't be able to carry units while its flying (as I explicitly stated), and it would be restricted to holding infantry only, and that infantry does cost supply.

  8. #18

    Default Re: Planetary Fortress discussion

    My strat is going to be making lots of CC's and turning them into PF's. That way, who needs supply depots and bunkers full of marines! They're like depots that defend themselves.

  9. #19

    Default Re: Planetary Fortress discussion

    The PF does have it's uses, like being used to defend against a rush, or defending a high yield expansion.

    But I think it could be more than that. It could have more abilities revolving around combat/defense, while the OC focuses on economy.

    Like say, if you got a PF, it can also be an eBay. Or it could be the pre-req to better bunkers or something. Even if you have to lower its attack power, I think making it useful in more situations would make it more worthy of the Terrans, and a better competitor against the OC.

    But as of now, I think it's 'fine'.

  10. #20
    The_Blade's Avatar Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,249

    Default Re: Planetary Fortress discussion

    What if we add a falling block of concrete or some chunks of neosteal that will block chokes instead of mules for the PF.

Similar Threads

  1. Tempest Discussion
    By Wankey in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 142
    Last Post: 03-06-2011, 02:36 PM
  2. Planetary Fortress : Overpowered based on BR4?
    By Santrega in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 10-28-2009, 11:46 AM
  3. Put the nuke on the Planetary Fortress?
    By Crazy_Jonny in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: 08-29-2009, 08:34 PM
  4. WoW Discussion V1.0
    By adx in forum Off-Topic Lounge
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-08-2009, 06:20 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •