Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 32 of 32

Thread: Siege Tanks, obsolete?

  1. #31

    Default Re: Siege Tanks, obsolete?

    Still not convinced that the Banshee is too weak for spearheading. Invisibility aside, they do 12x2 damage and have 140 hp (more than the Viking).
    I guess I should take the time to admit that the Thor is probably keystone to new Terran strategies, to avoid the old Goliaths/tanks combination that is overused in SC (Although the Marauder helps alleviate this problem)

  2. #32
    Pandonetho's Avatar SC:L Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,214

    Default Re: Siege Tanks, obsolete?

    It's not good for spearheading because it soaks 0 damage for your ground forces, which is what Starcraft is, a ground based game. It also doesn't block or take up space so that opponents need to travel around it.

    Also, 140 HP vs 400 HP, you tell me which is a better damage soaker/spearheader.

Similar Threads

  1. Valk + tanks vs zerg = pwnage
    By sandwich_bird in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-30-2009, 12:06 AM
  2. Suggestion: Replace thor with an Anti-Air Siege tank
    By Santrega in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 05-18-2009, 08:55 PM
  3. Siege tank
    By Perfecttear in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-15-2009, 03:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •