Page 5 of 16 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 156

Thread: IgroMir 2009: imba.Adolf[RA] reports his SC2 opinions

  1. #41

    Default Re: IgroMir 2009: imba.Adolf[RA] reports his SC2 opinions

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicol Bolas View Post
    That makes no sense. Diablo 3 has a far greater likelihood of pulling customers from WoW than SC2.
    It makes perfect sense. Any game that's worth a damn has the potential to draw subscribers. Hell, I know with me personally all other games will cease to exists once SC2 is released, regardless of their genre. The only exception being D3.

    As always, you seem to have trouble distinguishing opinion from facts.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gifted
    And a final comment. There is no confirmation about it being Cataclysm and is purely speculation.
    Grrr, don't try and subdue my anger with your logic! But you're right, the above is only my speculation as a result of my lack of understanding of how this game can look so friggin complete and still not be playable.

    Just let me vent at Blizzard...it eases my frustration at how much they suck at timelines and decision making.

  2. #42

    Default Re: IgroMir 2009: imba.Adolf[RA] reports his SC2 opinions

    Quote Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur View Post
    Well said. People need to calm down. If youve followed Blizzard games at all youd know from the 2007 initial announcement this was going to happen and most likely will happen a couple more times.
    As much as I agree that people need to calm down, we can also respect that people had hope and the hope was proven false. There's nothing wrong with people showing a bit of frustration.

    The new shiney is coming later, I don't think any person without a grounded understanding of the industry will be happy about this, and even those with that understanding will still feel a little empty inside.
    Please be aware of the SC:L Posting Rules and Guidelines.


    If I were you, I'd look at these links. You might even follow or like them or something...

    StarCraft: Legacy: Like us on Facebook - Follow us on Twitter - Subscribe to our Youtube channel
    Legacy Observer: Watch live on Twitch.tv - Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Subscribe to Youtube Channel

  3. #43

    Default Re: IgroMir 2009: imba.Adolf[RA] reports his SC2 opinions

    Unrelated to the turn of this conversation, the articles are been written in news form. You can find them at the following links. They are linked in the Day 2 Coverage. Thank you again Pure.Wasted for doing this for us.

    http://sclegacy.com/feature/3-events...-igromir-day-1

    http://sclegacy.com/feature/3-events...-igromir-day-2
    Please be aware of the SC:L Posting Rules and Guidelines.


    If I were you, I'd look at these links. You might even follow or like them or something...

    StarCraft: Legacy: Like us on Facebook - Follow us on Twitter - Subscribe to our Youtube channel
    Legacy Observer: Watch live on Twitch.tv - Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Subscribe to Youtube Channel

  4. #44

    Default Re: IgroMir 2009: imba.Adolf[RA] reports his SC2 opinions

    I wouldn't call that a confirmation that beta is delayed, there was no formal announcement this is all kind of vague.

    If it is delayed I will be happy because this game needs lots of work
    Quote Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post
    I want my name in bright yellow, to represent "Forum Douchebag."

  5. #45

    Default Re: IgroMir 2009: imba.Adolf[RA] reports his SC2 opinions

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamshank View Post
    If it is delayed I will be happy because this game needs lots of work
    I assume you mean the Macro APM sinks and Thor?

  6. #46

    Default Re: IgroMir 2009: imba.Adolf[RA] reports his SC2 opinions

    Quote Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post
    I assume you mean the Macro APM sinks and Thor?
    Might as well include the Zerg while we're at it.

    Hell, by the time they can actually get things rolling with this game, perhaps they'll be able to reintroduce LAN and condense all 3 campaigns into one box?

    Okay, I'm done venting for now...

  7. #47

    Default Re: IgroMir 2009: imba.Adolf[RA] reports his SC2 opinions

    Quote Originally Posted by Blazur View Post
    Might as well include the Zerg while we're at it.

    Hell, by the time they can actually get things rolling with this game, perhaps they'll be able to reintroduce LAN and condense all 3 campaigns into one box?

    Okay, I'm done venting for now...
    The problem with the Zerg is they don't really feel as "new" as the other races. They are the race who should have evolved the most, not the least.

  8. #48

    Default Re: IgroMir 2009: imba.Adolf[RA] reports his SC2 opinions

    Quote Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post
    I assume you mean the Macro APM sinks and Thor?

    and mothership, hellion, lurker, roaches, DT, infestor, carriers, mutalisk, HT, Immortal, Siege Tank, reapers, Overseer, Planetary fortress, mauraders, collosus...

    we miss anything?

  9. #49

    Default Re: IgroMir 2009: imba.Adolf[RA] reports his SC2 opinions

    Quote Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur View Post
    and mothership, hellion, lurker, roaches, DT, infestor, carriers, mutalisk, HT, Immortal, Siege Tank, reapers, Overseer, Planetary fortress, mauraders, collosus...

    we miss anything?
    The Mutalisk, HT, Immortal, Tank, Reaper, Overseer, Marauder, and Colossus are unanimously OK right now and should not be on that list.

    The Hellion, Roach, DT, Infestor have very minor tweaks needed, like model change, tier change, or an iffy ability.

    From that list only the defensive Mothership, boring Lurker, boring Carrier, and MULE-less PT bother me right now.

  10. #50

    Default Re: IgroMir 2009: imba.Adolf[RA] reports his SC2 opinions

    Quote Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid View Post
    The Mutalisk, HT, Immortal, Tank, Reaper, Overseer, Marauder, and Colossus are unanimously OK right now and should not be on that list.
    Well, I'm a little iffy on the Immortal, Tank, and Reaper... but we'd need the Beta to confirm any of these sort of suspicions.
    http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/7699/commun1.png

Similar Threads

  1. Opinions and effectiveness of Medivac?
    By Iceman_jkh in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 08-30-2009, 04:15 AM
  2. After watching the Battle Reports.
    By screw_ball69 in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-21-2009, 05:21 AM
  3. A few words from Dustin about Battle Reports
    By n00bonicPlague in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 05-10-2009, 03:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •