
Originally Posted by
Turalyon
Number 1 isn't specifically a reason for the Zerg to attack Confederate beacons. Also, "Confederates trying to lure Zerg" is an assumption on Mengsk's part. The audience is led to believe Mengsk's rhetoric in this instance due to his being a voice of reason (at the time) and our knowledge of the Confeds history, but there's the possibility of Mengsk being potentially wrong about this too. Afterall, he also assumed the Zerg were actually created/bred by the Confeds specifically as weapons due to his negative bias against them and we know this is wrong because the audience has privileged information (ie: Zerg history) that he doesn't. It could just be that the Confeds developed the Psi-emitter for some other unspecified reason (which could be more or less nefarious than what Mengsk thought it'd be) because there's inherently a problem with the idea of the Confeds knowingly developed the Psi-emitter especially for attracting Zerg. If they really did know enough about the Zerg to manipulate them wholesale (it would've taken years of study to observe and verify such a fact/effect, for example), they surely would have also known the extent of the threat they possessed to some degree and would've made contingencies against them - they have afterall been the top-dog amongst the Terrans for about a century and no despotic reign can remain that long without being prepared, paranoid and on-guard all the time. As such, that the Confeds were largely unaware and incapable of handling the Zerg (as shown through Duke) suggests the possibility they didn't actually know much about the Zerg as we're led to believe.
I don't really get number 2. Why would Zerg being attracted to and targeting what would essentially be the innately most powerful and dangerous human beings be considered an unintelligent move by the Terrans? From a Terran/human perspective (and being one myself), I'd find that the specificity of the Zerg attraction to enhanced individuals of our species to be very alarming rather than comforting.
Number 3 makes sense but not with Number 1. If the aim for the Terrans is to lure Zerg via beacons and the Zerg become "lured" with the intent of wanting the Terrans to stop "luring" them, the result of the Terrans aim still supersedes the Zergs aim. Also, I thought the idea of Zerg encroachment on the Terrans was supposed to be subtle (as far as what Zerg consider subtlety I suppose) as to avoid direct Protoss contact and to observe them (as stated in the manual). The Zerg are not supposed to be "outright attacking" the Terrans as such in their invasions of the Terran worlds - though the subtlety/ difference of that may be lost when seen from the Terran perspective.
Lastly, of the multiple reasons, you've omitted the supposed fundamental conceit of the Zerg wanting to find a Terran psychic to incorporate into their fold in order to effectively assist their engagements with the Protoss. I'm assuming you still hold that conceit but just didn't mention it since you presumed it was a given? All in all, this still doesn't resolve the issue of assuming all 3 races are "equal" when there's an inherent disparity/unequalness/general weakness of the Terrans when compared to the other two.