That still makes the protoss look like idiots for not realizing that treating intelligent beings like property might be a bad idea long before they made that mistake.
A wonderful philosophical debate, but would people really care in practice? If my family died and I was offered a perfect replication, I would not care about quantum fidelity and neither would the clones. I take what I can get.
That would not take the meaning out of death. If it did then nobody would enjoy cyberpunk fiction. A society where the afterlife was a real thing and the dead could be revived would be a fascinating thing to explore. It also makes the protoss less like the funny-looking humans they are now. I expect them to not be funny-looking humans and that the writers actually think about how having a forced empathy network and other amazing technology would affect their behavior.
The judicators are way too stupid to make sense. I would expect that behavior from USA politicians because humans are not connected to an empathy network, but if the judicators are connected to an empathy network which forms the foundation of their civilization, their constant obvious stupidity really should not happen. The writing contrives to make them look like bumbling morons rather than giving them any nuance or believable justification.
I am not demanding that the protoss be hyper-intelligent. I only only expect them to be at least as smart as the audience.
Because the Khala exists and it is the foundation of their civilization. The entire point of having the damn thing is to make them distinct in psychology and behavior from humans, such as their impossible world peace. If they are just humans playing a D&D LARP, then they should be replaced by actual humans. If the judicators have always acted like asshats who alienate everyone else, then the Khala's peace should never have been possible. Unless they are genuinely sympathetic to the plights and causes of the templar and khalai, the other castes would have revolted and killed them long ago. Considering that the Aeon of Strife supposedly lasted for millions of years or thousands of generations or whatever and peace was impossible until the Khala was instituted, I think it is safe to say that protoss feel emotions and hold grudges orders of magnitude more strongly than humans do and that they will not tolerate the same blatant idiocy in their politics that humans do.
Yet you accept the protoss are too damn stupid to realize the same thing?
Like what? And yes, it has to sound like something we the genre savvy audience would think sensible rather than the idiotic drivel that Blizzard shits out.
The rogues were not part of the Khala, so the judicators did not feel their pain. Furthermore, the Sargas entry does not specifically imply the Khala has "immersion levels," only that they do something to resist its influence on them. We do not really receive an explanation, but I would think the Khala works like the Tumblr hive mind and the Sargas resist it by more strongly embracing their cultural heritage or something. Trying to reduce immersion in the Khala would definitely be considered a crime.
The protoss are not the zerg. The protoss clearly have the ability to manipulate how the Khala works given how much they studied it and it is nowhere as strong as the Overmind, so you are blowing things out of proportion. Furthermore, Tassadar goes against your claim by surrendering because he feels the suffering of his enemies.
Because canon really is that stupid.
I am pretty sure the copy itself and everyone who interacts with it will contest this. A copy of a living person would be an identical twin. Honestly, it makes social, economic, military, etc sense to copy people as many times as needed. A brilliant scientist could be everywhere their services are required, while dead relatives could be replaced with perfect duplicates. Funerals would be happy celebrations since the deceased would exist forever within the Khala and return to fight in times of need. Society would be fascinatingly alien compared to our own. The dark side would be that such a society would have a horrifyingly casual attitude towards death, considering people expendable as long as copies exist elsewhere.





Reply With Quote
