Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 69

Thread: Kotick is an asshole

  1. #51

    Default Re: Kotick is an asshole

    Quote Originally Posted by trace wm View Post
    You people still think highly of Valve after how they've handled L4D/L4D2?

    I love the Half-Lifes as much as anyone but my faith has been shaken just a tad.
    L4D2 is the first time I've ever lost respect for VALVe. I still love the company, but the way they managed this franchise is very unlike them.

  2. #52

    Default Re: Kotick is an asshole

    Quote Originally Posted by newcomplex View Post
    Bob is an asshole, but you guys don't get what he means.

    Game developers often fail to utilize efficient if mechanical, soulless and boring devices such as QA (quality assurance). Sometimes, they get so stuck in their own asses to realize their making a unprofitable game.

    His entire point is that the game industry isn't unlike any other industry. Devs need to get a positive bottom line worth the investment and time.

    Nothing he said is new, and nothing he said is going to be detrimental to the industry. Every other corporate head who hasn't played a game in twenty years, probably including blizzard CEO's think on similar lines.

    Heres the asshat part. Bobby knew what kind of impression his words were going to have on the gaming community. He also knew that it wouldn't harm his company. Every other exec pretends to care. Bob doesn't even care enough to pretend. He doesn't care what in his mind, a bunch of trolls and basement dwelling nerds think. That conceit is the only thing hes guilty of.
    New complex, um... I know my posts can be large, but I know I've touched on many of these subjects multiple times

    The problem isn't that Kotick is doing anything "good" or "evil" in my eyes. In fact, by removing those aspects, it's always been my side to say that there is no problem. However, you did pull out a large generality to say that all CEOs "pretend to care". By nature of the industry, game design is the one exception where CEOs can care quite a lot about the products they design by the average nature of how they got there. Some got there in terms of business decision, but if you look at Blizzard's for example.. he started out as a codemonkey in a building writing code, eating pizza and getting sleep deprivation as many of the other individuals along side him.

    Going back on subject.. as you said, there is nothing wrong with him saying what he said. Games will still sell as long as they produce good games. This doesn't change the fact that what he says will have the general gamer population perceive him poorly based on what he said. It also doesn't change the fact that the typical person investing into Activision from a pure business standpoint will perceive these words as a sign of a productive business.
    Please be aware of the SC:L Posting Rules and Guidelines.


    If I were you, I'd look at these links. You might even follow or like them or something...

    StarCraft: Legacy: Like us on Facebook - Follow us on Twitter - Subscribe to our Youtube channel
    Legacy Observer: Watch live on Twitch.tv - Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Subscribe to Youtube Channel

  3. #53
    spychi's Avatar SC:L Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,224

    Default Re: Kotick is an asshole

    Valve, Bioware, Blizzard are the CO's you can trust (however because of l4d2 valve lost in my eyes)
    Mass Effect is great
    Kotick is an asshole and he needs to stay away from gaming, I would still kick his freckled face to blood
    Acti will have no influence on Blizz, perm
    EA is better than Acti
    Battlefield: 1943 (bestseller), Bad Company 2 (looks great), Dante's Inferno (God of War like game with it's own story), Dead Space (best horror of the decade with fun new mechanics like zero-G), also they take under their wings CO's like Bioware, which is not a bad aspect if you consider them only as producers of great games like Mass Effect

    Mass Effect Universe Fan, I support Mass Effect 2 and Battlefield: Bad Company 2 for Game of the year award! ME2 still is being the best rated game this year! Keep it up

  4. #54

    Default Re: Kotick is an asshole

    I agree that Valve, Bioware, and Blizzard are the best game developers right now. But their higher offices are a bit too scummy.

  5. #55
    Pandonetho's Avatar SC:L Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,214

    Default Re: Kotick is an asshole

    Forgive my lack of knowledge on L4D2, but what is everyone giving it such a hard time about?

    I played L4D1 and I thought it was superb.

  6. #56

    Default Re: Kotick is an asshole

    Quote Originally Posted by Pandonetho View Post
    Forgive my lack of knowledge on L4D2, but what is everyone giving it such a hard time about?

    I played L4D1 and I thought it was superb.
    The argument is that Valve somehow "promised" lots of down-loadable content for L4D. Instead, they announced L4D2 a year after L4D was released. People got angry they'd have to pay full price for what should have been cheap expansion content. Valve responded by saying that they added so much stuff to L4D2 that it was almost like a completely new game anyway.

  7. #57
    Pandonetho's Avatar SC:L Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,214

    Default Re: Kotick is an asshole

    Oh I see, thanks. Sounds just like the people bashing the trilogy.

  8. #58

    Default Re: Kotick is an asshole

    Quote Originally Posted by Pandonetho View Post
    Oh I see, thanks. Sounds just like the people bashing the trilogy.
    Welcome to economics. Supply, and demand.

  9. #59

    Default Re: Kotick is an asshole

    I have to agree with the people against L4D2. L4D is good but god I wouldn't pay the full price for a game that only have 4 campaign that don't last that long. This is completely retarded. For this price you can buy I don't know Fallout 3 and have so much more for your money. If they would have made more downloadable content the game would have been fine and well worth the money but now they're pulling this L4D2 crap. No thx.

  10. #60

    Default Re: Kotick is an asshole

    Quote Originally Posted by sandwich_bird View Post
    I have to agree with the people against L4D2. L4D is good but god I wouldn't pay the full price for a game that only have 4 campaign that don't last that long. This is completely retarded. For this price you can buy I don't know Fallout 3 and have so much more for your money. If they would have made more downloadable content the game would have been fine and well worth the money but now they're pulling this L4D2 crap. No thx.
    See, this is exactly what I don't get about the anti-L4D2 faction. Allow me to see if I can understand it.

    Fallout 3, to use your example, cost $50 at startup. I don't know how much the DLCs cost when they first came out, but right now you can buy 2 2-packs for a total combined price of $40.

    By all accounts the DLCs didn't actually include all that much new stuff in them. By all accounts L4D2 is even bigger than L4D1, with 4 full campaigns, five new "uncommon" zombies, three (or was it 4?) brand new zombie heroes, a slew of new melee weapons, completely new and upgraded models for all players AND zombies, an updated Director that completely changes the levels even MORE than the last time around, including weather and time of day...

    It is essentially a giant DLC pack all rolled into one. If Valve had released it as such nobody would have raised an eyebrow. But they tout it as a sequel, which it rightly is as big as one (and larger than many sequels I've seen) and people suddenly think this is a bad thing?

    Am I missing something here?
    Without a home. Without a people. Without mercy. The Arcani

    Blizzard's Exact Mathematical Definition of Soon™: {soon|1 month<soon<∞}

    Another?!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •