The Dating Thread

[Visions of Khas]

Nissa, I'd like to ask: what aspects of feminism do you find so unappealing? Or is it more about the KIND of people it seems to attract?

[TheEconomist]

No need to be purposefully dense, Khas. Feminism is cancer and has nothing to do with humanism or equality.

[TheEconomist]

It ...

... is ....

... done .......

[Visions of Khas]

That's funny, Econ, I don't think I mentioned you...

Nissa, I'd like to ask

Oh look, I didn't.

I'm asking because I want to understand her view. You see everyone here saying, "You're wrong and I'm right," instead of trying to understand someone else's views and perceptions.


And that's the only way you can change anyone's view: by understanding theirs.

[TheEconomist]

And that's the only way you can change anyone's view: by understanding theirs.

Wrong, you change someone's views by letting them fuck up and feel the pain of their stupid. Everything else is just self-masturbation or a waste of time. After all, I don't see you converting to the Libertarian doctrine yet I told you what would happen in the world ten years in advance.


Also, I'm getting married. Met the chick last night. She speaks to my soul in ways I never knew possible. I'll let you figure out why.

Capture3.JPG
Capture4.JPG

Yeah, my word play's gone to shit, but I'm fuckin' tired, and, clearly, it's not necessary



-- Posting this at 4:20 AM in the fucking morning just to say I just had sex.

[Nissa]

I honestly don't know why you brought up feminism, Khas. It has nothing to do with anything. I believe women should be treated well, but I also believe the same of men. Feminism is the idea that women should be able to blame men for everything wrong in society, whine about things that don't matter, and make excuses for killing the unborn. Feminism exists also to attach the idea of women's rights to the rights of other liberal groups, which is why you'll hear feminists talking about gays, race, and other stuff.

In other words, feminism is just a particular branch of progressivism.

Back on topic.

Honestly, yes, it does hurt when men get rejected. It likewise hurts women when we get rejected/are ignored. I consider these particular hurts equivalent, because they are basically the same thing. When women have sex outside of a committed relationship, that is a different hurt. She's basically giving a man what he wants with potentially no hint of what she wants in return. She begins to feel devalued and disgusting. Because women are more relational than men, the damage here is worse. It has to do with chemical differences in the brain, and how they change because of sex.

I don't know how many times I've been randomly told by different women, without asking them, that I should wait to have sex. A coworker at some place I used to work was telling me how much she regretted it, and not because of pregnancy or disease. A random stranger I met while walking to the library told me to wait on sex just because I commented on her daughter's jelly shoes. And I had to watch as another woman slowly became angrier, more materialistic, and more liberal as she allowed men to treat her like just another good time.

I don't know why men apparently can treat sex like it's nothing, but it's not nothing for women. Sex is not much of a benefit to us if it has no love, and in the end is destructive. Given that this persists in all the various cultures, it is clearly not a cultural problem, but one that deals with the nature of men and women in and of themselves. Besides, look at today's culture. Magazines are telling women how to please lovers, fashion catwalks are filled with transparent shirts and tiny shorts, television shows go on and on about scandals and lovers, and feminists are writing web articles that tell men not to be happy about female orgasms. This is clearly not a culture of slut-shaming, and you're blind if you think otherwise.

That's part of what feminism is, Khas. It's a reaction to allowing oneself to become a sex tool, and trying desperately to morally justify to oneself to act foolishly.

[Gradius]

And that's the only way you can change anyone's view: by understanding theirs.

Some of us just like debating.

Magazines are telling women how to please lovers, fashion catwalks are filled with transparent shirts and tiny shorts, television shows go on and on about scandals and lovers, and feminists are writing web articles that tell men not to be happy about female orgasms. This is clearly not a culture of slut-shaming, and you're blind if you think otherwise.

For the 12th time, our pop culture may be sexualized, because men love sex and women want to be desired, but this has nothing to do with the fact that guys don't want their daughters or wives to be sperm receptacles. Did you not just say that strangers randomly approach you and tell you wait to have sex? If you slept around with a lot of dudes, would your boyfriend or parents honestly be ok with that?

A coworker at some place I used to work was telling me how much she regretted it, and not because of pregnancy or disease. A random stranger I met while walking to the library told me to wait on sex just because I commented on her daughter's jelly shoes. And I had to watch as another woman slowly became angrier, more materialistic, and more liberal as she allowed men to treat her like just another good time.

Sounds completely anecdotal. I know plenty of girls that are smart, happy, successful and are comfortable with their sexuality. One of them had a guy actually be in bed with them, but refused to sleep with her because he wanted their relationship to be special. Then she later complains to me "what in the world possessed him into thinking that I want to date?" Plenty of girls are ok with one night stands. But yeah, the general trend is that most women are seeking a relationship, because that's what our culture says "good girls" do.

I don't know why men apparently can treat sex like it's nothing, but it's not nothing for women. Sex is not much of a benefit to us if it has no love, and in the end is destructive.

Yeah, because it's a combination of our culture and different evolutionary strategies for reproduction. Check out the article I linked.

[TheEconomist]

I don't know why men apparently can treat sex like it's nothing, but it's not nothing for women.

Women just need more effort to get started. I was ready to fuck the moment I saw her profile, it takes work on my part for her. In the end, the girls I'm with are on the same level I'm on.

Then she later complains to me "what in the world possessed him into thinking that I want to date?"

This, my sophomore year in college I totally squandered a date with a 'nice girl' I knew from class. She was classy and good in class, turned out she wasn't so nice, and me being nice was fucking everything up.

Plenty of girls are ok with one night stands.

Almost like it takes two to get down, lol

[Visions of Khas]

I don't know why men apparently can treat sex like it's nothing, but it's not nothing for women. Sex is not much of a benefit to us if it has no love, and in the end is destructive.

Yeah, because it's a combination of our culture and different evolutionary strategies for reproduction. Check out the article I linked.

It's Ks and rs all the way down.

[TheEconomist]

So, basically, I should move to a place with highly competitive biodiversity, high mortality rates, and contested resources. I guess I'll be moving to Brazil to get my r up, K is for the cucks.