Wasn't sure where to put this, but my question is, are stalkers a machine like that of the Dragoon or is this a living creature.
10-19-2009, 04:42 PM
#1
Wasn't sure where to put this, but my question is, are stalkers a machine like that of the Dragoon or is this a living creature.
10-19-2009, 04:49 PM
#2
They are metal vehicles imbued with a Dark Templar's essences, so they are mechanical in lore. Under game mechanics, IIRC, they are mechanical as whell.
10-19-2009, 05:51 PM
#3
Well, the Dragoon was mechanical and biological. You could Lockdown and Broodling them.
The Stalker is supposed to be "a machine controlled by the shadow-essence of a Dark Templar warrior fused into a metal body", and it has that stupid head sticking out from the front, so it's probably Mech+Bio again, and so is the Immortal.
10-19-2009, 05:57 PM
#4
Yeah, it was the head protruding from the front of it that had me confused.
10-19-2009, 06:03 PM
#5
10-19-2009, 06:56 PM
#6
As do I. It adds personality to the unit. Personally, I really don't get why people are raising such a ruckus over the Stalker head issue. I mean, I don't see anyone complain that the Colossus and Reaver having heads and they're both 100% machines with zero individuality!
10-19-2009, 09:21 PM
#7
It's not the existence of a head in general. It's the existence of a Protoss head.
10-19-2009, 10:59 PM
#8
But It isn't even their real head. It's just something the use to relate with others.
Decepticons, transform and rise up!
10-20-2009, 12:31 AM
#9
10-20-2009, 02:18 AM
#10
So, your argument switches from it being silly that a head be there to it being silly because of the shape of the head? What's so wrong about having a Protoss-shaped head on a Protoss?
Siege Tank drivers are able to step out of their vehicle to interact with the Marines. Stalkers, on the other hand, can't (as far as we know).