Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 74

Thread: StarCraft II Battle Report Four

  1. #21

    Default Re: StarCraft II Battle Report Four

    A few Photon cannons could've done the trick with the Hellions (which suck against armor).

    He made a huge mistake not training Immortals.

  2. #22

    Default Re: StarCraft II Battle Report Four

    "God I cant believe he went Immortals! Did he really think David wasn't just going to EMP them!"

  3. #23

    Default Re: StarCraft II Battle Report Four

    "God I cant believe he went Colossi! Did he really think David wasn't just going to EMP them — not to mention that they suck against armor?"

  4. #24

    Default Re: StarCraft II Battle Report Four

    The cannons really should have been used, so that he could protect his probes and not lose so much time harvesting.

    After getting some cannons, he should have gotten dark templars and forced david kim into using his energy on scans, instead of mules. Then, he should have done more harassment himself, so that he could actually get ahead.

    If he did that, it really wouldnt matter what he built... But yes, immortals would have helped as well as phase shift for the thors... I bet he could have used force field a little and been more effective in protecting his base as well.

    All in All, David Kim is a beast... To keep nuking like that... geez
    http://sclegacy.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=23&dateline=124193888  6

    Please stop the spread of Mass Effect!!!

  5. #25

    Default Re: StarCraft II Battle Report Four

    Quote Originally Posted by Santrega View Post
    The cannons really should have been used, so that he could protect his probes and not lose so much time harvesting.

    After getting some cannons, he should have gotten dark templars and forced david kim into using his energy on scans, instead of mules. Then, he should have done more harassment himself, so that he could actually get ahead.

    If he did that, it really wouldnt matter what he built... But yes, immortals would have helped as well as phase shift for the thors... I bet he could have used force field a little and been more effective in protecting his base as well.

    All in All, David Kim is a beast... To keep nuking like that... geez
    Good points. There were many things that would've helped.

    Concerning Phase Shift, can Phased units still move around?

  6. #26
    Kegluneq's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    39

    Default Re: StarCraft II Battle Report Four

    Absolutely beautiful Psi Storm animation. (cool sound too!)

    @n00bonic
    I don't think so, since phased units are supposed to disappear aren't they?

  7. #27
    Pandonetho's Avatar SC:L Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5,214

    Default Re: StarCraft II Battle Report Four

    Concerning Phase Shift, can Phased units still move around?
    Last I've heard of it, yes they could. It just phases the unit out but he's like translucent or something but can still move.

  8. #28

    Default Re: StarCraft II Battle Report Four

    Get rid of the Thor. Terrible unit! Goliaths would have just as effective!

  9. #29

    Default Re: StarCraft II Battle Report Four

    Kim had far to many marauders, so Immortals wouldn't really pay of, so instead he went with the Colossus, i don't see nothing wrong with this decision.
    I for myself if in his position would go with an Zealot , Colosuss and HT force and ignore the stalkers anf just be zealot heavy, which would also be a lot cheaper, and it would also alow for more HT.
    And howcome Kim never used the Thors special ability ?

    .
    Last edited by Perfecttear; 10-20-2009 at 03:36 AM.

  10. #30

    Default Re: StarCraft II Battle Report Four

    Quote Originally Posted by Perfecttear View Post
    And how come Kim never used the Thor's special ability?
    He did, multiple times. First on some Stalkers, then on the far left expo.

Similar Threads

  1. Battle Report #4 is OUT!!!
    By n00bonicPlague in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 202
    Last Post: 10-31-2009, 11:38 PM
  2. What do You Want to See in Battle Report 4?
    By mr. peasant in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 08-16-2009, 07:56 PM
  3. StarCraft II Battle Report Three
    By PsiWarp in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 198
    Last Post: 06-29-2009, 07:39 AM
  4. StarCraft II Battle Report Three
    By Dauntless in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 06-26-2009, 12:37 AM
  5. Leaked Starcraft 2 Battle Report 3?
    By GGTeMpLaR in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-19-2009, 12:44 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •