Not really. The Zerg invasion of Shakuras was clearly led by rogue cerebrates - it's the whole reason Kerrigan is even there in the first place. She's vying for control over the Zerg with the cerebrates and is manipulating the Protoss into helping her achieve that end.
It's already OP enough that despite losing the Overmind the Zerg aren't actually all feral (when they should be) and still have the wherewithal to take over Shakuras without them also having this supposed instilled back-up Overmind programming. Being able to resurrect the Overmind on top of all that just "takes the cake", too. I mean really, if we are to also believe that the Overmind didn't really die because its programming was still inherent in the Zerg, what narrative purpose or consequence was achieved by having the Overmind die in the first place?
This is partly (the other part is my cynicism) why I'm critical now of even my preference of wanting the Overmind to come back in future iterations. It was barely tolerable the first time in BW since it already potentially devalued the meaning of Tassadar's sacrifice and turned the Zerg race into a plot device, but to consider also that the Overmind didn't need to die/that its death was superfluous at the end of Sc1 because the Zerg had innate Overmind programming just makes one suspect that anything that ever happens from now on is pointless/meaningless. I got that feeling after experiencing Sc2 and I would like it to not invade what appreciation I still have for BW, thanks very much.
The arbitrary distinction that the former is considered "bad" and the latter being "good"?
Why? Only Amon died, not his realm. Besides, his realm is the Void is it not? If that ended with his death, there'd be no Void powers in general as well...
Hmmm, following on from this train of random thought, I wonder what would Protoss be like if they lost access to psionics.







Reply With Quote


