
Originally Posted by
The_Blade
I like to watch a lot of shows mainly as entertainment but also as a source of information. Series I do enjoy will likely take up time from my day. Moreover, I'll sit down and will only watch the show. However, I will also skim through some othere, but I'm either not interested enough or they have plot flaws. I skim through them by either jumping through episodes, skipping episodes, watching them while watching something else, and by playing them at double the speed.
I'm currently watching: Agent Carter, Gotham, The Flash, Vikings, Planet Earth, Agents of Shield, The Time in Between, Dem Som Draeber, and The Walking Dead.
While I also Skim through: Arrow, Modern Family, Parks and Recreation, Helix, The Librarians, Cuentame Cómo Pasó (Spanish series from the early 2000s), Adventure Time, The Americans, Big Bang Theory, House of Cards, 12 Monkeys, Sleepy Hollow, Supernatural, Doctor Who, Elementary, and others.
Here's what I understand from Nissa's point of view of modern TV. She dislikes cultural agendas on a story and prodigy protagonists (the one in a million). Some examples of the first case... House of Cards has a great story, but it's mounted on the population's view of politics. It explains politics in a way the show will sell. Something similar will happen to Game of Thrones. As of the next season, main characters will continue to be butchered for the sake of audience shock. As for prodigy protagonists... Arrow is probably the best case of this flaw. A hooded archer wins against automated weapons every single time and is also in the center of every unreal story arc.
@Nissa: I believe you would also like: Vikings (history channel) and The Time in Between (Spanish serie).
Now, anime...
It is true some series have a great story, but they are designed for an otaku audience in today's industry. I've watched most of the mainstream series with a great story (Attack on Titan, FMA, Death Note, etc), but even they have an attatchment towards any of the main, modern anime tropes. Attack on Titan has a great sense of character development, but also falls into the pits of violence and nudity. Death Note has a brilliant duel between the two main characters, but collapses into an annoying female character. The best contrast between the anime industry, now and then, is probably the one created between the FMA twins. "Full Metal Alchemist" (2003) was closer to plot development, while "Full Metal Alchemist: Brotherhood" (2009) took its plot from trope designs (violence and unstoppable hero).
Anime derailed into this because it was meant to split from conventional animation and its trends.
Don't get me wrong, I love good anime series. However, the tropes still annoy me from time to time (fucking annoying female characters). The best way to make someone, within the anime target population, see this is by comparing the anime industry to the Discovery Channel educational fiasco. Discovery Channel switched their show focus towards redneck/outdoor/reality shows. They still make a lot of money and their target audience is happy. However someone from the outside or previous target audience can clearly see the marketing con.