
Originally Posted by
Telenil
Well, yes, if you start from the assumption Mengsk is untouchable, then it makes sense that he is untouchable. But that wasn't really the point, I think.
It's more like it is tiresome (at least to me) to see Mengsk take yet an other massive political defeat and still be securely in power, even though the writers went out of their way to promise the player that it's different this time. It should also have been different the time before that, but it is not exactly the same point.
The explanation given for HotS is that Mengsk is an awesome politician and all that, but a really good politician is not someone that gets exposed as a mass murderer, gets people rioting in the street and manages to bounce back. It is someone that succeeds at not having the people riot against him when the information leaks out.
I would argue that he just got lucky. Strictly speaking, you don't need to be competent or have a strategy to succeed at something - sometimes things turn out your way for reasons that have nothing to do with your actions. But you will lose a lot more if you make rookie mistakes, so, well, you still shouldn't.