One of my main problems with Char was the complete moronic way they portrayed Warfield.
I'll now put what I wrote on him from the battlenet forums here:
If you recall when the Zerg invasion started in WoL, Warfield was chosen by Mengsk to deal with the invasion. Due to Dominion propaganda, Raynor was portrayed as nothing more than an idiotic scumbag hellbent on chaos in the sector.
But Warfield should have at least gained respect for Raynor's fighting abilities, if not his character. Remember, in the Media Blitz mission, when Mengsk discovered what Raynor was up to, he ordered Warfield to stop him. Warfield had more troops and more resources, but Raynor won anyway.
Now, Warfield might have interpreted this as HIS victory, because he drove the Raiders off Korhal, but that wasn't Raynor's intent, and Warfield HAD to have seen the broadcast in the aftermath of that mission.
Yet right before the Char invasion began, Warfield told Raynor that while he led 5 separate invasions against the swarm, Raynor just hid under a rock.
Did he COMPLETELY forget what happened on Korhal? What gave him the right to call Raynor a coward when Raynor ALREADY BEAT HIM on Korhal?
Furthermore, assuming Warfield was telling the truth about the 5 offensive operations against the swarm, then why the hell didn't the UNN new broadcasts (which is supposed to be pro-Dominion) say anything about it?
The only explanation is quite simple: More than likely, all of Warfield's offensives ended in failure, and the swarm invasion continued unhindered.
This brings us to the Char invasion itself: Raynor warned Warfield not to attack head on, but Warfield did it anyway, feeling that Raynor was too stupid to know anything about war, and look where THAT got him. Raynor and Tychus had to rescue Warfield or he would have been killed by the Zerg.
Only right before the LAST WoL began did Warfield begin to show respect for Raynor, saying that Mengsk was probably wrong about him, as he risked his life for Dominion troops who would have been hunting him down, and praised Raynor for what he did. In that briefing, I had honestly thought Warfield had finally learned.
.
But in HotS, it was revealed Warfield had learned absolutely NOTHING. Sending Gorgon Battlecruisers against Kerrigan only ONE at a time, from a lore perspective, is nothing short of ludicrous.
Kerrigan said because the Gorgon was so huge, it'd why Warfield couldn't fit more than one in the trench at one time. THAT part is acceptable, there's nothing wrong there.
But if that's true, then why the hell didn't Warfield order the Gorgons to fly ABOVE the trench? You can't use the excuse of "too high altitude means inaccuracy", just look at how accurate the satellite targeting systems are TODAY.
The same was true in the "Old Soldiers" mission, when Kerrigan was assaulting his operations center. Warfield continuously claimed he didn't need the artifact in order to beat her, and look where that got him. This was the EXACT same attitude he had in WoL right before the Char invasion, thinking he knew everything, and that got him nowhere.
When you combine these points together, then in the cutscene where he demanded Kerrigan let the shuttles of wounded go, you could actually say Kerrigan had the more justifiable hand here if she DIDN'T let them go. After all, she told Warfield MANY times on Char to leave the planet (this was before she even knew Raynor was alive), and Warfield didn't listen. So in that respect, HE was the one who got his soldiers killed for his inability to swallow his own foolish pride.




Reply With Quote


