So yeah...LotV?

[protoswarrior]

Technically the Protoss never found out how the Overmind discovered Aiur.

That's incorrect.

The Overmind discovered Aiur by touching with Zeratul's mind as he slew the Cerebrate. Zeratul glimpsed into the Overmind's plans while it uncovered the location of Aiur.

[DonnyZeDoof]

That's incorrect.

The Overmind discovered Aiur by touching with Zeratul's mind as he slew the Cerebrate. Zeratul glimpsed into the Overmind's plans while it uncovered the location of Aiur.

Well yeah but it's not like Zeratul is going to tell the Protoss, 'Hey I revealed the location of Aiur to the Zerg.'

- - - Updated - - -

That's incorrect.

The Overmind discovered Aiur by touching with Zeratul's mind as he slew the Cerebrate. Zeratul glimpsed into the Overmind's plans while it uncovered the location of Aiur.

Well yeah but it's not like Zeratul is going to tell the Protoss, 'Hey I revealed the location of Aiur to the Zerg.'

[Nissa]

Zeratul mentions it during one of the Protoss missions, so Tassadar, the Executor, and (I think) Fenix knew. Not that they'd spread it around, but yeah.

[DemolitionSquid]

After some deliberation, I've finalized my thoughts on LotV.

*Ahem*

Blizzard is so creatively bankrupt they had to bring back the Lurker. Fuck Blizzard, I give up.

That is all.

[protoswarrior]

Well yeah but it's not like Zeratul is going to tell the Protoss, 'Hey I revealed the location of Aiur to the Zerg.'

He actually did reveal that to the "Executor" (you) during the mission briefing.

[Nissa]

After some deliberation, I've finalized my thoughts on LotV.

*Ahem*

Blizzard is so creatively bankrupt they had to bring back the Lurker. Fuck Blizzard, I give up.

That is all.

I don't know, the lurker is pretty cool. I assumed that they brought it back because people wanted it, rather than anything else.

[DemolitionSquid]

I don't know, the lurker is pretty cool. I assumed that they brought it back because people wanted it, rather than anything else.

That is not a legitimate excuse. Its the same reason they kept the BROKEN AND USELESS Carrier. Nostalgia is not a valid reason for lazy or outright ineffective design.

[Nissa]

Lurkers are ineffective?

[DemolitionSquid]

Lurkers are ineffective?

Lazy was a jab at bringing back Lurkers. Ineffective was another jab at the fucking Carrier.

[Nissa]

I still don't see how lurkers are a lazy idea, if people really like them and they add to gameplay. But if you wanted something different, I won't argue with you. Blizz hasn't been all that creative, of late.

Oh, by the way, I love your sig.