Kerrigan mutation makes no sense

[Zabimaru]

But to return to the topic; Kerrigan's mutation is... odd. Especially when compared to the appearance of most infested Terrans.

Well she was put in a cocoon like a pretty butterfly.

[Ghost_828]

Well she was put in a cocoon like a pretty butterfly.

Cocoon or not, certain aspects of her mutation are impractical.

[flabortast]

Doesn't matter if it is. StarCraft always ran with the "Rule of Cool" principle.

[Pandonetho]

Personally it doesn't seem too cool to me.

[n00bonicPlague]

Doesn't matter if it is. StarCraft always ran with the "Rule of Cool" principle.

Then why does the Mothership suck on chocolate salty balls?

[Perfecttear]

Then why does the Mothership suck on chocolate salty balls?

Because it's only meant to look cool , not actually be usuable.
You know there is really no gameplay role or reason, why there would be a need for the Mothership gameplaywise, Blizzard only add it becasuse they like shiny things

[n00bonicPlague]

The Arbiter was shiny, and that's all the mothership really is atm: a super-shiny Arbiter.

IMO they should move it to be a special unit in the campaigns — with its original abilities (if not more powerful ones).

[flabortast]

I love the way you proudly state your opinion as if it was fact.

I like it being a Super Arbiter than being some lame super offense unit. Making the Mothership the ultimate support caster makes it so its presence in the battlefield is feared and its absence a relief with how its abilities boost your army's effectiveness. Also, the notion that Blizzard will put the MS in without any gameplay significance is frankly, pure BS and counterproductive to their :every unit will see use" philosophy.

[n00bonicPlague]

......wow......you completely misunderstood me dude.

I love the way you proudly state your opinion as if it was fact.

IMO ≠ I am the lord of all things factual

IMO = in my opinion

I like it being a Super Arbiter than being some lame super offense unit. Making the Mothership the ultimate support caster makes it so its presence in the battlefield is feared and its absence a relief with how its abilities boost your army's effectiveness.

I agree — I like the current unit role. I am expressing my discontent towards the use of the Mothership model with the Super Arbiter role. That is why I said they should remove the Mothership model and replace it with an improved Arbiter model. Actually make the thing a Super Arbiter — not a Sub Mothership.

Also, the notion that Blizzard will put the MS in without any gameplay significance is frankly, pure BS and counterproductive to their :every unit will see use" philosophy.

If by gameplay you mean multiplayer, then how come half the units that are in the campaign aren't in the regular melee? If you meant campaign, did I say that the MS wouldn't have a significant gameplay role? No. I said that I would prefer that the MS be in singleplayer and in the campaign ONLY. I didn't even remotely suggest that the presence of the MS in Multiplayer melee would prevent it from having a significant campaign role.

[Visions of Khas]

Am I the only one questioning why she kept her breasts? Unless her mammary glands excrete creep, I don't think they're beneficial to the maturation process of larvae...