Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 97

Thread: 12.03.13

  1. #31

    Default Re: 12.03.13

    tsk tsk, silly grad

  2. #32

    Default Re: 12.03.13

    Quote Originally Posted by TheEconomist View Post
    Reading his book now. Never heard so much obvious logic turned into revolutionary revelation.
    Never picked up a Dan Brown novel, have you?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gradius View Post
    I always got the sense that the dialog in WoL was written by multiple people, probably even including the actual map level designers. As for the actual SP mechanics itself, it doesn't really need fixing, that's something I've always enjoyed. I'd say if they were to fix anything it should be re-recording lines, fixing cinematics, and redoing missions & objectives. The pre-rendered cinematics are definitely not changing from their original vision, and we know those are crucial to the story.
    So, you think that WoL, as it is, could have been made a good-great game by changing dialog and in-game cinematics?

    How much of the missions/objectives would they have to change? Not counting that one with the mothership, obviously.

    I realize that this has been covered before, maybe, but it's been buried beneath months of back and forth squabbling over just how bad the WoL story really was.

  3. #33

    Default Re: 12.03.13

    I kind of agree with Gradius, though... the campaign was fun. Gimmicks can be fun.
    I've fought for the Terran revolution, I've seen the promise of the Protoss, and now I'm ready to join the might of the Swarm...

  4. #34
    Gradius's Avatar SC:L Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    9,988

    Default Re: 12.03.13

    Quote Originally Posted by Quirel View Post
    So, you think that WoL, as it is, could have been made a good-great game by changing dialog and in-game cinematics?
    Nah, I'm just saying that the pre-rendered cinematics are not as easy to change as dialog once they get into development. Or at least, I thought I read an interview which said that.

  5. #35
    TheEconomist's Avatar Lord of Economics
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,895

    Default Re: 12.03.13

    Never picked up a Dan Brown novel, have you?
    No, although that's close but loses since its still fiction.

    Anyone whose spent anytime in a field that requires you to ignore the ignorance of the masses already knows everything Nate Silver is saying instinctively.



    Rest In Peace, Old Friend.

  6. #36

    Default Re: 12.03.13

    2/3 of the original price for an expansion? Sounds reasonable enough.

    If you get it from retails it will be less than 40$.

  7. #37

    Default Re: 12.03.13

    I'm just so... disillusioned with games these days. So many things that should have been AAA day-1 buys only turned out to be terribleh. The only major game companies I can trust to deliver cohesive, well thought, well written, and fun games anymore are Valve and Bethesda

  8. #38
    TheEconomist's Avatar Lord of Economics
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,895

    Default Re: 12.03.13

    No Bioware bruh?



    Rest In Peace, Old Friend.

  9. #39

    Default Re: 12.03.13

    Quote Originally Posted by TheEconomist View Post
    No Bioware bruh?
    After the massive disappointments of Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect 3, and SWTOR? BiowEAr is dead to me.

  10. #40
    TheEconomist's Avatar Lord of Economics
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,895

    Default Re: 12.03.13

    SWTOR and DA2, sure? But ME3 wasn't that bad



    Rest In Peace, Old Friend.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •